/ |1. unconscious programme /1. Man ------------------|2. conscious programme | working |3. written programme | for |4. standardized programme | himself \ II. | PROGRAMMES-| | /1. unconscious /(a) made by man | /(a) One of a ---| programme |(b) " " manager | | gang |2. conscious |(a) made by man | | | programme, |(b) " " manager \2. Man --| | not written -|(a) made by man working | |3. written |(b) " " manager for | | programme |(a) made by man another \(b) Individual -|4. standardized |(b) " " manager output | programme |(a) made by man \ \(b) " " manager INTERRELATION OF THESE TYPES.--The man is classified first, as working for himself, or working for another. There will usually be a fundamental difference, at the outset, in the minds of these two men, for the man working for himself will be of a more independent cast of thought. There will be no question as to the man's output showing up separately, unless he chooses to prevent this by having others work with him. Neither will there be any question but that, if a record is made, he makes it himself, unless someone who is not vitally connected with the work, as some onlooker, interested or disinterested, should make the records for him. But the typical case of the man working for himself would be that he was working as an individual, and that the record was made by himself. There would then be four kinds of records--an unconscious record, a conscious record not written, a written record and a standardized record. The "unconscious record" would be, in reality, no record at all. It would simply be, that somewhere in the man's mind there would be a record of what he had done, which, except as a "fringe of consciousness" would not particularly influence his programme. What we mean by a "conscious record" would be more of a set habit, the man knowing that he had done the work in a certain way. This would begin to influence, more or less, his programme, and also his knowledge of his capacity for work. With a written record, would come a thorough knowledge on his part of what he had done and how he had done it, and we must note that with this written record comes the possibility for some sort of a set programme, the man knowing what it will be possible to do, and how he had best do it. With the standardized record comes the standardized method.