But it is not possible that the gift of millions should bring the giver
much happiness, if it brings any. There is too much publicity and
display in such a gift; it is noised abroad from press and platform,
and creates a new distress in the mind of the giver. The giver knows
that unscrupulous, undeserving persons or causes will now lay siege
to a share of his wealth, because of the notoriety his great gift has
brought him. Some are so oppressed with appeals that they have to
appoint committees to give away the money. There must be about as much
satisfaction in that as in having a committee to kiss the women you
love.
Besides this, great benefactions cause uneasiness, lest they be
misapplied or unwisely distributed, or lest the glory may be eclipsed
by some other millionaire giving a larger sum to a more popular cause.
Thus donations become a source of unrest and worriment, and the donor’s
last state is worse than his first. The giver of the mite is generally
unknown of the crowd, sometimes unknown even of the one to whom he
gives, so that his joy comes from the giving, and cannot be taken from
him. To him alone is it true that “the gift is to the giver” and that
“it is more blessed to give than to receive.” If there is no real joy
to be had from giving of great wealth, why should we desire to have it,
or fret ourselves that we do not win it? Neither to acquire wealth nor
to possess it can bring happiness or peace. We have seen how great is
the price we must pay to get great riches, and it is easy to see why
their possession cannot bring peace or happiness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account