The Psychology of the EmotionsRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The Psychology of the Emotions
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Emotions
The first period is that of protoplasmic, vital, organic
pre-conscious sensibility. We know that the organism has its memory;
it preserves certain impressions, certain normal or morbid
modifications; it is capable of adaptation: this point has been well
established by Bering (who had been preceded by Laycock and Jessen).
It is the outline of the superior form of psychic conscious memory.
In the same way there exists an inferior unconscious form—organic
sensibility—which is the preparation and the outline of superior
conscious emotional life. Vital sensibility is to conscious feeling
what organic memory is to memory in the ordinary sense of the word.
This vital sensibility is the capacity to receive stimuli and to
re-act to them. In a well-known memoir, now of ancient date,[2]
Claude Bernard wrote: “Philosophers generally only know and admit
conscious sensibility, that which their ego bears witness to. It is
for them the psychic modification, pleasure or pain, determined by
external modifications.... Physiologists necessarily place
themselves at another point of view. They have to study the
phenomenon objectively, under all the forms which it puts on. They
observe that at the moment when a modifying agent acts on man, it
not only provokes pleasure and pain, it not only affects the soul:
it affects the body, it determines other re-actions besides the
psychic re-actions, and these automatic re-actions, far from being
an accessory part of the phenomenon, are on the contrary its
essential element.” Then he showed experimentally that the
employment of anæsthetics, pushed to an extreme, first abolished
conscious sensibility, then the unconscious sensibility of the
intestines and glands, then muscular irritability, finally the
lively movements of the epithelial tissue. In the same way among
plants: under the influence of ether the sensitive plant loses its
singular properties, seeds cease to germinate, yeast to ferment,
etc. Whence follows the conclusion that sensibility resides, not in
the organs or tissues, but in their anatomical elements.
-----
Footnote 2:
“La sensibilité dans le règne animal et le règne végétal”, (1876,
in _Science expérimentale_, pp. 218 _et seq._).
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account