The Psychology of the EmotionsRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The Psychology of the Emotions
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Emotions
Footnote 50:
Schüle, _Traité clinique des maladies mentales_, Art. “Mélancolie”
(French edition), pp. 21, 28.
Footnote 51:
G. Dumas, _Les états intellectuels dans la mélancolie_, where may
be found several detailed observations.
Can we trace back these two modes of manifestation to a common and
deeper cause? This is Krafft-Ebing’s[52] solution: “We must consider
psychic pain and the arrest of ideas as co-ordinate phenomena; and
there is reason to think of a common cause, of a nutritive trouble
of the brain (anæmia?), leading to a diminished expenditure of
nervous activity. Taken comprehensively, melancholia may be
considered as a morbid condition of the psychic organism founded on
nutritive troubles, and characterised on the one hand by the feeling
of pain and a particular mode of reaction on the part of the whole
consciousness (psychic neuralgia), on the other by the difficulty of
psychic movements (instinct, ideas), and finally, by their arrest.”
Footnote 52:
Krafft-Ebing, _op. cit._, vol. ii., sec. 1, chap. i.
I am unwilling to incur the reproach of inferring more from facts
than they contain, and of insisting on unity at any price; but it
follows from the preceding that if the element of feeling is not
everywhere and always primary, at least it is so in the majority of
cases. Besides, it is closely connected with fundamental trophic
troubles, so that we arrive at the same conclusion by another road.
Dumas (_op. cit._, pp. 133 _et seq._) has insisted on the depressing
influences of marshy soil, on the stagnation, the physical and moral
apathy of the inhabitants of Sologne, the Dombes, the Maremma, and
other regions infested by _malaria_, a condition which may be summed
up in two words, sadness and resignation. These facts are quite in
favour of the organic origin of melancholia.
The special study of the anomalies of pleasure and pain is not
important for itself alone. The formula generally admitted since
Aristotle, which couples pleasure with utility, pain with what is
injurious, admits of many exceptions in practice. Perhaps the
constitution of a pathological group in the study of pleasure and
pain may permit us to solve some difficulties, to prevent the rule
and the exceptions being placed on the same plane, and unduly
assimilated to one another. We shall see that this is so in one of
the following chapters.
CHAPTER V.
THE NEUTRAL STATES.
_Two methods of study—Affirmative thesis founded on observation,
deduction, and psycho-physics—Negative thesis: the
psychological trinity; confusion between consciousness and
introspection—Diversity of temperaments._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account