The Psychology of the EmotionsRibot, Th. (Théodule)
Science
The Psychology of the Emotions
Ribot, Th. (Théodule)
Emotions
Now let us question the psycho-physicists who have treated this
subject according to their own special method, while coming to
different conclusions. It is difficult to adopt a procedure more
theoretical than theirs, or one better adapted to show the
insufficiency of the intellectualist method in this domain of
psychology. In truth, the subject treated by them is a special
aspect of the problem, not its totality; they are inquiring whether,
in the “transformation” of pleasure into pain, and _vice versâ_,
there is, in the passage from one contrary to the other, a point of
neutrality or indifference. Wundt graphically represents the
phenomenon by a curve: the portion of this curve above the line of
the abscissa has a positive value, and corresponds to the
development of pleasure; the portion below corresponds to the
development of pain, and has a negative value; the precise point
where the curve cuts the line of the abscissa (to rise in the
direction of pleasure or descend in that of pain) corresponds to
neutrality or indifference. Lehmann, who, however, admits that weak
sensations are neutral states, gives a curve rather different from
that of Wundt. From an observation first made by Horwicz, and
experiments conducted by Lehmann himself, it appears that, if one
dips one’s finger into water whose temperature gradually rises from
35° to 50° Centigrade during a space of 2 minutes and 20 seconds,
one feels first an agreeable warmth, then some slight, unpleasant
prickings, then oscillations of intense prickings with moments of
rest, and lastly, pain. His conclusion is contrary to Wundt’s, for
he finds that the passage from pleasure to pain does not take place
in a neutral state.[56]
Footnote 56:
Wundt, _Grundzüge der physiol. Psychologie_ (4th German ed.), vol.
i. pp. 557 _et seq._; Lehmann, _Hauptgesetze_, etc., §§ 236-241.
One of Wundt’s most distinguished pupils, Külpe, in his _Umriss
der Psychologie_ (1895), considers the existence of a state of
indifference “can hardly be doubted in the face of a long series
of observations which support it.” (English edition, p. 242.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account