The Pullman boycott : $b A complete history of the great R. R. strikeBurns, W. F.
History
The Pullman boycott : $b A complete history of the great R. R. strike
Burns, W. F.
Pullman Strike, 1894
Mr. Lovejoy: "Six months previous to the convention of the American
Railway Union which met in Chicago, June 12, I had an understanding with
the superintendent that I would get a leave of absence and was to put a
man in my place while absent. When I got ready to come to Chicago, I
sent a note asking for such leave of absence and transportation. The
transportation was sent me, but no answer to my note was given. When I
came to Chicago I called at the office of the superintendent to have an
understanding about my leave and he told me that a written notice was
not necessary. Whenever I wanted to go anywhere all I had to do was to
put a good man in my place and go. The Tuesday following the opening of
the convention the assistant superintendent went to La Salle and put
another man in my place permanently. No reason has ever been given me
why such action was taken."
Commissioner Wright: "Mr. Lovejoy, I suppose you have given the subjects
of labor troubles and strikes some study. I wish to ask if you can
suggest any solution of these troubles."
Mr. Lovejoy: "Yes, sir, I have and I consider the only way to solve the
question is for the government to own the railroads."
Commissioner Kernan: "What is your reason?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "I think the employes would receive better treatment and be
better satisfied. I think they would get the same kind of treatment as
the postal employes and there would be no strikes under these
conditions."
Commissioner Kernan: "What do you think of arbitration as a remedy?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "I have never seen arbitration tried to any great extent
and while I believe in the principle I am not prepared to say that I am
in favor of compulsory arbitration."
Commissioner Wright: "If the government owned the railroads how would
you avoid the changes incident to a change in administration?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "I consider that railroad employes would be in practically
the same position as postal clerks. They would be under civil service
rules to the extent of being pensioned after a term of years of faithful
service."
Commissioner Kernan: "Would it not cause jealousy among other branches
of workingmen if such a system should be adopted toward railroad men?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "I do not think so. I am not jealous of postal clerks."
Commissioner Wright: "What would you suggest as the next best thing if
government ownership proved impracticable?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "That the government keep hands off altogether; let the
roads and their men fight out their troubles free from outside
interference. It is the knowledge that the government can be called to
their aid that makes many of the railroad officials so arbitrary with
their men."
Commissioner Kernan: "Don't you think that disputes ought to be settled
by some other method than open warfare?"
Mr. Lovejoy: "There would be none if the authorities would keep away.
The employes would settle their grievances by arbitration."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account