Doyle, Arthur Conan, 1859-1930 -- Parodies, imitations, etc.; Fantasy fiction; Holmes, Sherlock (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
“Excuse me, captain,” said Abeuchapeta, “but that is where you and I do
not agree. We’ve got our ship and we’ve got our crew, and in addition we
find that the Fates have thrown in a hundred or more women to act as
ballast. Now I, for one, do not fear a woman. We can set them to work.
There is plenty for them to do keeping things tidy; and if we get into a
very hard fight, and come out of the mêlée somewhat the worse for wear,
it will be a blessing to have ’em along to mend our togas, sew buttons on
our uniforms, and darn our hosiery.”
Morgan laughed sarcastically. “When did you flourish, if ever, colonel?”
he asked.
“Do you refer to me?” queried Abeuchapeta, with a frown.
“You have guessed correctly,” replied Morgan, icily. “I have quite
forgotten your date; were you a success in the year one, or when?”
“Admiral Abeuchapeta, Sir Henry,” interposed Kidd, fearing a further
outbreak of hostilities—“Admiral Abeuchapeta was the terror of the seas
in the seventh century, and what he undertook to do he did, and his
piratical enterprises were carried on on a scale of magnificence which is
without parallel off the comic-opera stage. He never went forth without
at least seventy galleys and a hundred other vessels.”
Abeuchapeta drew himself up proudly. “Six-ninety-eight was my great
year,” he said.
“That’s what I thought,” said Morgan. “That is to say, you got your
ideas of women twelve hundred years ago, and the ladies have changed
somewhat since that time. I have great respect for you, sir, as a
ruffian. I have no doubt that as a ruffian you are a complete success,
but when it comes to ‘feminology’ you are sailing in unknown waters. The
study of women, my dear Abeuchadnezzar—”
“Peta,” retorted Abeuchapeta, irritably.
“I stand corrected. The study of women, my dear Peter,” said Morgan,
with a wink at Conrad, which fortunately the seventh-century pirate did
not see, else there would have been an open break—“the study of women is
more difficult than that of astronomy; there may be two stars alike, but
all women are unique. Because she was this, that, or the other thing in
your day does not prove that she is any one of those things in our day—in
fact, it proves the contrary. Why, I venture even to say that no
individual woman is alike.”
“That’s rather a hazy thought,” said Kidd, scratching his head in a
puzzled sort of way.
“I mean that she’s different from herself at different times,” said
Morgan. “What is it the poet called her?—‘an infinite variety show,’ or
something of that sort; a perpetual vaudeville—a continuous performance,
as it were, from twelve to twelve.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account