Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
That is a question of taste. On rereading the novel, I see that Dickens
makes Drood as sympathetic as he can. He is very young, and speaks of
Rosa with bad taste, but he is really in love with her, much more so than
she with him, and he is piqued by her ceaseless mockery, and by their
false position. To Jasper he is singularly tender, and remorseful when
he thinks that he has shown want of tact. There is nothing ominous about
his gaiety: as to his one fault, we leave him, on Christmas Eve, a
converted character: he has a kind word and look for every one whom he
meets, young and old. He accepts Mr. Grewgious’s very stern lecture in
the best manner possible. In short, he is marked as faulty—“I am young,”
so he excuses himself, in the very words of Darnley to Queen Mary! (if
the Glasgow letter be genuine); but he is also marked as sympathetic.
He was, I think, to have a lesson, and to become a good fellow. Mr.
Proctor rightly argues (and Forster “thinks”), that Dickens meant to kill
Neville Landless: Mr. Cuming Walters agrees with him, but Mr. Proctor
truly adds that Edwin has none of the signs of Dickens’s doomed men, his
Sidney Cartons, and the rest. You can tell, as it were by the sound of
the voice of Dickens, says Mr. Proctor, that Edwin is to live. The
impression is merely subjective, but I feel the impression. The doom of
Landless is conspicuously fixed, and why is Landless to be killed by
Jasper? Merely to have a count on which to hang Jasper! He cannot be
hanged for killing Drood, if Drood is alive.
MR. PROCTOR’S THEORY CONTINUED
Mr. Proctor next supposes that Datchery and others, by aid of the opium
hag, have found out a great deal of evidence against Jasper. They have
discovered from the old woman that his crime was long premeditated: he
had threatened “Ned” in his opiated dreams: and had clearly removed
Edwin’s trinkets and watch, because they would not be destroyed, with his
body, by the quicklime. This is all very well, but there is still, so
far, no legal evidence, on my theory, that Jasper attempted to take
Edwin’s life. Jasper’s enemies, therefore, can only do their best to
make his life a burden to him, and to give him a good fright, probably
with the hope of terrifying him into avowals.
Now the famous ring begins “to drag and hold” the murderer. He is given
to know, I presume, that, when Edwin disappeared, he had a gold ring in
the pocket of his coat. Jasper is thus compelled to revisit the vault,
at night, and there, in the light of his lantern, he sees the long-lost
Edwin, with his hand in the breast of his great coat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account