Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
Mr. Cuming Walters connects the figure of the whiskerless young man
kneeling to a girl in a garden seat, with the whiskered Jasper’s proposal
to Rosa in a garden seat. But Jasper does not kneel to Rosa; he stands
apart, leaning on a sundial; he only once vaguely “touches” her, which
she resents; he does not kneel; he does not kiss her hand (Rosa “took the
kiss sedately,” like Maud in the poem); and—Jasper had lustrous thick
black whiskers.
Again, the same whiskerless young man, bounding up the spiral staircase
in daylight, and wildly pointing upwards, is taken by Mr. Cuming Walters
to represent Jasper climbing the staircase to reconnoitre, at night, with
a lantern, and, of course, with black whiskers. The two well-dressed men
on the stairs (Grewgious, or Tartar, and Crisparkle) also, according to
Mr. Cuming Walters, “relate to Jasper’s unaccountable expedition with
Durdles to the Cathedral.” Neither of them is Jasper; neither of them is
Durdles, “in a suit of coarse flannel”—a disreputable jacket, as Sir L.
Fildes depicts him—“with horn buttons,” and a battered old tall hat.
These interpretations are quite demonstrably erroneous and even
impossible. Mr. Archer interprets the designs exactly as I do.
As to the young man in the light of Jasper’s lamp, Mr. Cuming Walters
says, “the large hat and the tightly-buttoned surtout must be observed;
they are the articles of clothing on which most stress is laid in the
description of Datchery. But the face is young.” The face of Datchery
was elderly, and he had a huge shock of white hair, a wig. Datchery wore
“a tightish blue surtout, with a buff waistcoat and grey trousers; he had
something of a military air.” The young man in the vault has anything
but a military air; he shows no waistcoat, and he does not wear “a
tightish blue surtout,” or any surtout at all.
[Picture: Under the trees]
The surtout of the period is shown, worn by Jasper, in Sir L. Fildes’s
sixth and ninth illustrations. It is a frock-coat; the collar descends
far below the top of the waistcoat (buff or otherwise), displaying that
garment; the coat is tightly buttoned beneath, revealing the figure; the
tails of the coat do not reach the knees of the wearer. The young man in
the vault, on the other hand, wears a loose paletot, buttoned to the
throat (vaults are chilly places), and the coat falls so as to cover the
knees; at least, partially. The young man is not, like Helena, “very
dark, and fierce of look, . . . of almost the gipsy type.” He is blonde,
sedate, and of the classic type, as Drood was. He is no more like Helena
than Crisparkle is like Durdles. Mr. Cuming Walters says that Mr.
Proctor was “unable to allude to the prophetic picture by Collins.” As a
fact, this picture is fully described by Mr. Proctor, but Mr. Walters
used the wrong edition of his book, unwittingly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account