Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
The most careful of the attempts at a reply about Edwin, a study based on
deep knowledge of Dickens, is “Watched by the Dead,” by the late
ingenious Mr. R. A. Proctor (1887). This book, to which I owe much aid,
is now out of print. In 1905, Mr. Cuming Walters revived “the auld
mysterie,” in his “Clues to Dickens’s Edwin Drood” (Chapman & Hall and
Heywood, Manchester). From the solution of Mr. Walters I am obliged to
dissent. Of Mr. Proctor’s theory I offer some necessary corrections, and
I hope that I have unravelled some skeins which Mr. Proctor left in a
state of tangle. As one read and re-read the fragment, points very dark
seemed, at least, to become suddenly clear: especially one appeared to
understand the meaning half-revealed and half-concealed by Jasper’s
babblings under the influence of opium. He saw in his vision, “_that_, I
never saw _that_ before.” We may be sure that he was to see “_that_” in
real life. We must remember that, according to Forster, “such was
Dickens’s interest in things supernatural that, but for the strong
restraining power of his common sense, he might have fallen into the
follies of spiritualism.” His interest in such matters certainly peeps
out in this novel—there are two specimens of the supernormal—and he may
have gone to the limited extent which my hypothesis requires. If I am
right, Dickens went further, and fared worse, in the too material
premonitions of “The Signalman” in _Mugby Junction_.
With this brief preface, I proceed to the analysis of Dickens’s last
plot. Mr. William Archer has kindly read the proof sheets and made
valuable suggestions, but is responsible for none of my theories.
ANDREW LANG.
ST. ANDREWS,
_September_ 4, 1905.
THE STORY
DRAMATIS PERSONÆ
FOR the discovery of Dickens’s secret in _Edwin Drood_ it is necessary to
obtain a clear view of the characters in the tale, and of their relations
to each other.
About the middle of the nineteenth century there lived in Cloisterham, a
cathedral city sketched from Rochester, a young University man, Mr. Bud,
who had a friend Mr. Drood, one of a firm of engineers—somewhere. They
were “fast friends and old college companions.” Both married young. Mr.
Bud wedded a lady unnamed, by whom he was the father of one child, a
daughter, Rosa Bud. Mr. Drood, whose wife’s maiden name was Jasper, had
one son, Edwin Drood. Mrs. Bud was drowned in a boating accident, when
her daughter, Rosa, was a child. Mr. Drood, already a widower, and the
bereaved Mr. Bud “betrothed” the two children, Rosa and Edwin, and then
expired, when the orphans were about seven and eleven years old. The
guardian of Rosa was a lawyer, Mr. Grewgious, who had been in love with
her mother. To Grewgious Mr. Bud entrusted his wife’s engagement ring,
rubies and diamonds, which Grewgious was to hand over to Edwin Drood, if,
when he attained his majority, he and Rosa decided to marry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account