The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
The conditions of the Oregon Question at the close of the period ending
1825 were, upon the whole, not unfavorable to America. It is true Great
Britain was the party in possession at this time through the settlements
of the Hudson’s Bay Company, but when it is remembered that these
settlements were made even before the more important concessions of the
conventions were made, these concessions are only the more strongly
significant of the disposition of the government of Great Britain to
treat fairly, at least, the claims of America. It is especially
significant of this disposition that the settlement at Fort George was
abandoned in the spring of 1825 by the British company in the
expectation that the Americans would speedily occupy it, and, though the
Americans failed at once to occupy it, it was left by the British
unoccupied for five years, as if they were waiting for the Americans to
come and claim their own. When we remember Britain’s well known
doctrine, of occupation within a reasonable time as necessary to
establish full title to lands claimed on the ground of prior discovery
and exploration, this can hardly be regarded as else than an invitation
on the part of Britain to the United States to come and make good their
title to at least that part of Oregon that lay south of the Columbia.
Occupation had been attempted, it will be remembered, in the case of the
establishments of the Pacific Fur Company at Astoria and other points on
the south and east of the Columbia. The whole conduct of England in
regard to these establishments, made for the purposes of trade, goes to
show that she regarded them as belonging to a legitimate mode of
occupation, the right of which she not only assumed to herself, but was
ready to allow to America. The failure of the settlements and their
ultimate abandonment as a mode of American occupation were due to the
accidents of war, not to the interference of diplomacy. The convention
of 1818, of joint occupation, was the embodiment of no new principle,
but simply the formal assent of both parties to a principle of
occupation assumed by America in the Astoria settlements, and by Great
Britain in those in the valley of the Columbia, and by each tacitly
allowed to the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account