The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
In his letter to Mrs. Victor, dated August 1st of that year, we get an
interesting glimpse of the plan in an earlier stage. The work is to be
divided, he says, somewhat in the following manner: Conquest of
Darien, one volume; Conquest of Mexico, one volume; Mexico under the
Viceroys, two volumes; Mexican Revolution and Modern History, one or
two; Explorations Northward and the History of California, three or
four; the Northwest Coast, Oregon and British Columbia together, two
or three; Alaska, one. Under the head of California history was to be
included somewhere the histories of Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and
Nevada, and the history of Oregon was likewise to include Washington,
Idaho, and Montana. Oregon and British Columbia he thought could be
written in a year. Not until six more years had passed was it finally
recognized that natural expansion as the work proceeded would
necessitate devoting to the series of history proper a number of
volumes exactly double that which was then contemplated. To this
series were added as a supplement an even half dozen volumes.
If we find that the outline grew from that of a few volumes in 1872 to
one of almost forty in 1884, and that the work expanded fourteen
volumes after it had been definitely laid out, we are not at all
surprised that the part of the whole which Mr. Bancroft intended to
write grew relatively less as time went on, and the part assigned to
others became correspondingly greater. There is some evidence to show
that when writing began on the first volume of the Central American
History in 1873, the director of the project actually had in mind the
plan which he gives in the Literary Industries, that of writing with
the aid of assistants who were to be responsible for "the study and
reduction of certain minor sections" which he was to "employ" in his
own writing. Thus we find, according to the information left by Nemos,
that Bancroft actually wrote half of the volume, that Oak at first
took out notes, and that Nemos prepared his work in the rough, leaving
a considerable part of it to be rewritten. For the next volume
undertaken, the first of the six on Mexico, we see that the chief was
unable to prepare so much material in its final form, and rested with
but two chapters completely to his credit, together with the rewriting
of part of Nemos' work on the remainder. In four or five years, he
expresses the determination of writing what he can himself and leaving
the rest to his aids. This as we shall see amounted in the end to his
doing about one seventh of the history, slightly revising the work of
the other authors, often by the aid of critics in his employ, and
preparing most of the material for the supplementary volumes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account