The Queen's Daughters in IndiaBushnell, Katharine C. (Katharine Caroline)
History
The Queen's Daughters in India
Bushnell, Katharine C. (Katharine Caroline)
Prostitution -- India; Women -- India -- Conduct of life; Women -- India -- Social conditions
The names of the special Commissioners were: Mr. Denzil Ibbetson and
Surgeon-Colonel J. Cleghorn, M.D., Inspector-General of Civil Hospitals
throughout the Punjab. In addition to these witnesses from India and
ourselves, Lord Roberts, Quartermaster-General Chapman, and Mr. Hyslop
Bell, of Darlington, were called before the Departmental Committee to
give evidence.
The statements of Lord Roberts and of General Chapman, who were called
before the Departmental Committee in August, proved to be matters of
intense interest, especially as regarded their disagreement as to Lord
Roberts' knowledge of the Infamous Memorandum. Lord Roberts testified
that, when the Resolution of 1888 was carried in the House of Commons
not permitting the compulsory examination of women or the licensing
of prostitution, he understood those measures to mean _abolition_,
not modification, of measures for the regulation of prostitution, and
proceeded accordingly. The Resolution meant the abolishing of the
periodical examination, of licensing, of compulsion, of regulation,
etc. He declared that he knew nothing of the Infamous Memorandum which
had been issued in his name, and that he "entirely disapproved" of
some of the contents of that circular, saying, "I certainly would not
have approved of that part of the Circular which referred to providing
them with pretty young women." Lord Roberts was confronted with a
mass of evidence which he little expected. After his own sweeping
contradictions of our statements, he was shown the report from the
Cantonment of Meean Meer which the Special Commission had brought from
India, and in which nearly every statement we had made was "admitted."
Other _prima facie_ evidence of the truth of our statements convinced
him that our testimony was not to be broken down. As he left the
Committee it was with the conviction that General Chapman was next
to be called, and would give most disagreeable evidence against him
as regarded the Infamous Memorandum and its authorship. Lord Roberts
proceeded immediately to Scotland, and from thence wrote the following
letter of apology:--
DUNBAR, Scotland, 11 August, 1893.
Having read the reports of Mr. Ibbetson's Committee, in regard to the
working of the Rules dealing with the abolition of Lock Hospitals,
etc., in Cantonments in India, and also the reports of the officers
commanding the seven stations which the Committee did not visit, I
frankly admit that the statements of the two American missionary
ladies, who made a tour through Upper India in the cold weather of
1891-92, for the purpose of inquiring into the matter, are in the main
correct.
I hoped and believed that the orders issued to give effect to the
Resolution of the House of Commons had been everywhere obeyed. In some
stations the Rules have been strictly enforced, but in others it now
turns out this has not been completely the case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account