The Queen's Maries: A Romance of HolyroodWhyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
General
The Queen's Maries: A Romance of Holyrood
Whyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
Mary, Queen of Scots, 1542-1587 -- Fiction
‘And the book? At least you cannot deny the book, nor its object, nor
its reflections on my mother and myself. Even the nice casuistry of
Master Knox cannot refine away his authorship of that “First Blast
of the Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women.” Oh! it is a
worthy title for a worthy production! and, in any other country under
heaven but this, it would have brought its writer to the block. By the
crown I wear, in a parallel case, my cousin of England would have had
it burnt by the common hangman!’
She breathed quick, and gesticulated more than was her wont. She was
lashing herself into anger, the gentle Queen, as she thought of her own
weakness and Elizabeth Tudor’s strength. Knox met her glance unmoved.
When thus embarked on the tide of argument, he was no more to be
influenced by force than persuasion; the softest eyes that ever smiled,
and the sternest brows that ever frowned, were alike to him. In the
pride of his calling, and the fierce delight of disputation, a man of
marble within and without.
‘As to the book that so angers your Majesty,’ said he, ‘I own to it
freely. Yes, I wrote it deliberately, and on reflection; nor is there a
position laid down, nor an argument adduced in the whole of it, that I
fear to establish and substantiate before any ten of the most learned
men in Europe!’
‘Then you maintain that I have no just authority even over my own
subjects?’ urged the Queen, with difficulty keeping back her tears.
‘These are all fair matters for dispute, madam,’ was his reply. ‘The
learned may surely be suffered to discuss such questions unmolested,
when they refrain from putting their theories of good government into
practice. Plato himself, as I need scarcely remind your Majesty,
argued the necessity of many reforms fundamentally opposed to the very
principles of the commonwealth in which he lived. The _litera scripta
manet_ indeed, madam; but it is for future generations; and no book
written, if left unfortified by persecution, ever yet subverted the
authority existent at the time it was composed, and against which it
may seem to have been aimed. Besides, madam,’ added the churchman,
warming into good-humour as he got into the full swing of his oratory,
‘my book was not directed so much against yourself as your namesake,
the bloody Jezebel of England, with her wicked satellites, godless
Gardiner and blaspheming Bonner, the one on her right hand, and the
other on her left! Had I meant to have troubled _your_ estate, madam,
would I not have chosen a more fitting time, and a weaker breach in the
defences, for my assault?’
‘But at least,’ resumed Mary, a little mollified by this admission,
‘ye cannot deny that ye have taught the people to follow a religion
different from that of their prince. How is this to be reconciled with
the divine command that subjects should obey their rulers? I cannot
wrestle with you in argument, Master Knox; I am but a foolish woman
after all; yet here, methinks, I have you on the hip.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account