The Queen's Reign and Its Commemoration: A literary and pictorial review of the period; the story of the Victorian transformationBesant, Walter
History
The Queen's Reign and Its Commemoration: A literary and pictorial review of the period; the story of the Victorian transformation
Besant, Walter
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
Before the Reform Act of 1832 the only persons who had votes at
elections were freeholders; in some boroughs the electors were the
Mayor and Corporation; some were “pocket” boroughs, in which the
territorial magnate of the neighbourhood nominated the Member; in
some there were only two or three electors, who openly put up the
seat to the highest bidder. The House of Commons was a body made
up almost entirely of younger sons or cousins of the Lords, who
voted as they were ordered; many of the members held places under
Government--they voted as they were told; many of the members were
bribed on every important occasion. On the declaration of the American
War of Independence it was in such a House Mr. Burke vainly thundered
and protested that taxation in a free country could only go with
representation. Alas! the liberties of the country had no other guard
than the House of Commons; and the House betrayed the country. It
took sixty years of almost continual struggle to get the Reform Act
of 1832; yet in a country of twenty millions no more than 440,000 had
votes. There are now six million voters; that is to say, the suffrage
is practically universal. There are people still outside the wide
limits of the franchise, but they are, as a class, so poor, so held
down by the hourly necessities of finding food, that they can hardly be
considered as suffering any loss of dignity by having no votes. For my
own part, I do not think that the suffrage should be a matter of right,
nor should it depend upon income or rent; I think that a man before he
is allowed to vote should show that he possesses some knowledge of the
history of his country and its constitution. I do not expect any one to
agree with me, but that is my opinion.
[Illustration: PRINCESS VICTORIA, AGE 8]
Consider, next, the changes in the conduct of elections. Formerly the
election was open and public: it occupied several weeks; during the
whole time the town was filled with violence, clamour, drunkenness, and
bribery; the elector had to fight his way to the hustings; the mob,
which took sides with impartial ferocity, fought each other and hustled
the electors. Since it was proclaimed how every man voted, electors
had to vote against their conscience for the sake of their private
interests--for instance, in the great Westminster election of 1784 the
King let his tradesmen understand clearly how he expected them to vote;
a contested election cost many thousands; no one could sit in the House
who had not an estate worth £300 a year at least; Roman Catholics,
Dissenters, and Jews were not permitted to become Members of Parliament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account