The Queen's Reign and Its Commemoration: A literary and pictorial review of the period; the story of the Victorian transformationBesant, Walter
History
The Queen's Reign and Its Commemoration: A literary and pictorial review of the period; the story of the Victorian transformation
Besant, Walter
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
The girl who lived in Bloomsbury Square, or in the suburbs--say
Clapham Common--had, in those days, to make herself happy with
slender and simple materials. There were very few concerts: I think
the Philharmonic was already in existence; Oratorios were sometimes
performed: it was not every girl who liked what was then called
classical music; the general cultivation of music was poor and meagre,
and within very narrow limits: people liked songs, it is true,
especially pathetic songs. These, like the poetry of the _Keepsake_
and _Friendship’s Offering_, mostly turned on the domestic affections.
The young ladies recognised this sentiment, bought or copied those
songs, and sang the most mournful of ditties. Everybody, in every class
which respected itself and claimed gentility of any kind, talked about
the opera, to which the well-to-do young lady was taken once a year,
solemnly. This gave her the right for the rest of the year to talk
about the _repertoire_, and to speak with disrespect of the leading
singers.
The theatre was very seldom visited; indeed there were reasons why it
was not desirable that young ladies should go to the theatre; if they
did go it was an event very much discussed both before and after. There
were only one or two theatres that respectable people could possibly
attend, and the one part of the house where ladies could be seen was
the dress circle. Now in the Thirties, if my information is correct,
there were good actors, but the plays were monstrously bad. The Queen,
however, used to like going to the theatre. If you walk down to those
north of the Strand, you may see how the road was widened for her
to go to the Adelphi melodramas. The reading of girls was carefully
selected for them; in serious circles--there were many circles in 1840
privileged to be serious--fiction was absolutely forbidden; its place
was taken by religious biography: wonderful to think how large a part
was played by religious biography about that time. I do not know what
books besides these biographies and records of “conversation” were
allowed, but I imagine that there were not many. At all events, a
young woman must not be allowed to read anything which would suggest
to her the wickedness of the world, the realities of the world, the
truth about men and women, or the meanings of humanity. She was to
leave her mother’s nest not only innocent--girls do still leave their
mothers in innocence--but also in a state of ignorance, which was
then mistaken for a state of grace. How far she really was ignorant
no one but herself could tell; one imagines that there may have been
some knowledge behind that demure countenance that was not generally
suspected.
[Illustration:
_Painting by Winterhalter_
THE FOUR ROYAL PRINCESSES
PRINCESS ROYAL, PRINCESS ALICE, PRINCESS LOUISE, AND PRINCESS HELENA]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account