The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
Reimarus takes as his starting‐point the question regarding the content of
the preaching of Jesus. “We are justified,” he says, “in drawing an
absolute distinction between the teaching of the Apostles in their
writings and what Jesus Himself in His own lifetime proclaimed and
taught.” What belongs to the preaching of Jesus is clearly to be
recognised. It is contained in two phrases of identical meaning, “Repent,
and believe the Gospel,” or, as it is put elsewhere, “Repent, for the
Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.”
The Kingdom of Heaven must however be understood “according to Jewish ways
of thought.” Neither Jesus nor the Baptist ever explain this expression;
therefore they must have been content to have it understood in its known
and customary sense. That means that Jesus took His stand within the
Jewish religion, and accepted its Messianic expectations without in any
way correcting them. If He gives a new development to this religion it is
only in so far that He proclaims as near at hand the realisation of ideals
and hopes which were alive in thousands of hearts.
There was thus no need for detailed instruction regarding the nature of
the Kingdom of Heaven; the catechism and confession of the Church at its
commencement consisted of a single phrase. Belief was not difficult: “they
need only believe the Gospel, namely that Jesus was about to bring in the
Kingdom of God.”(17)
As there were many among the Jews who were already waiting for the Kingdom
of God, it was no wonder that in a few days, nay in a few hours, some
thousands believed, although they had been told only that Jesus was the
promised prophet.
This was the sum total of what the disciples knew about the Kingdom of God
when they were sent out by their Master to proclaim its coming. Their
hearers would naturally think of the customary meaning of the term and the
hopes which attached themselves to it. “The purpose of sending out such
propagandists could only be that the Jews who groaned under the Roman yoke
and had long cherished the hope of deliverance should be stirred up all
over Judaea and assemble themselves in their thousands.”
Jesus must have known, too, that if the people believed His messengers
they would look about for an earthly deliverer and turn to Him for this
purpose. The Gospel, therefore, meant nothing more or less to all who
heard it than that, under the leadership of Jesus, the Kingdom of Messiah
was about to be brought in. For them there was no difficulty in accepting
the belief that He was the Messiah, the Son of God, for this belief did
not involve anything metaphysical. The nation was the Son of God; the
kings of the covenant‐people were Sons of God; the Messiah was in a pre‐
eminent sense the Son of God. Thus even in His Messianic claims Jesus
remained “within the limits of humanity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account