The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
The additions and omissions of this Gospel are alike skilfully planned. It
retains only those miracles which are symbols of a continuous permanent
miracle, through which the Saviour of the World works constantly,
unintermittently, among men. The Johannine miracles are not there for
their own sakes. The cures of demoniacs are not even represented among
them. These had no interest for the Graeco‐Roman world, and the Evangelist
was unwilling “that this Palestinian superstition should become a
permanent feature of Christianity, to be a reproach of scoffers or a
belief of the foolish.” His recording of the raising of Lazarus is, in
spite of the silence of the Synoptists, easily explicable. The latter
could not yet tell the story “without exposing a family which was still
living near Jerusalem to the fury of that hatred which had sworn with an
oath to put Lazarus to death.” John, however, could recount it without
scruple, “for by this time Jerusalem was probably in ruins, and the
hospitable family of Bethany were perhaps already with their Friend in the
other world.” This most naïve of explanations is reproduced in a whole
series of Lives of Jesus.
In dealing with the Synoptists, Herder grasps the problem with the same
intuitive insight. Mark is no epitomist, but the creator of the archetype
of the Synoptic representation. “The Gospel of Mark is not an epitome; it
is an original Gospel. What the others have, and he has not, has been
added by them, not omitted by him. Consequently Mark is a witness to an
original, shorter Gospel‐scheme, to which the additional matter of the
others ought properly to be regarded as a supplement.”
Mark is the “unornamented central column, or plain foundation stone, on
which the others rest.” The birth‐stories of Matthew and Luke are “a new
growth to meet new needs.” The different tendencies, also, point to a
later period. Mark is still comparatively friendly towards the Jews,
because Christianity had not yet separated itself from Judaism. Matthew is
more hostile towards them because his Gospel was written at a time when
Christians had given up the hope of maintaining amicable relations with
the Jews and were groaning under the pressure of persecution. It is for
that reason that the Jesus of the Matthaean discourses lays so much stress
upon His second coming, and presupposes the rejection of the Jewish nation
as something already in being, a sign of the approaching end.
Pure history, however, is as little to be looked for in the first three
Gospels as in the fourth. They are the sacred epic of Jesus the Messiah,
and model the history of their hero upon the prophetic words of the Old
Testament. In this view, also, Herder is a precursor of Strauss.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account