The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abusesLarrabee, William
History
The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abuses
Larrabee, William
Railroads; Railroads -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
"The Railways Clauses Consolidation Act provides, in detail,
for the use of railways by all persons who may choose to put
carriages thereon, upon the payment of the tolls demandable,
subject to the provisions of the statute and the regulations
of the company. The view originally taken of railways in
England evidently was to treat them as a common highway,
open to all who might choose to put carriages thereon. But
in practice it is found necessary for the safety of the
traffic that it should be exclusively under the control of
the company, and hence no use is, in fact, made of the
railway by others."
As to the questionable financial expedients so frequently resorted to in
building American railways, this author says:
"This is not the place, nor are we disposed, to read a
homily upon the wisdom of legislative grants, or the
moralities of moneyed speculations in stocks on the exchange
or elsewhere. But it would seem that legislation upon this
subject should be conducted with sufficient deliberation and
firmness so as not to invest such incorporations with such
unlimited powers as to operate as a net to catch the unwary,
or as a gulf in which to bury out of sight the most
disastrous results to private fortunes, which has justly
rendered American investments, taken as a whole, a reproach
wherever the name has traveled."
The opinion is expressed in this work that under certain circumstances
railroad securities should be aided by State credit, and is supported by
the following argument:
"Here we have no national funded stock in convenient sums
for small investment, and which, being sure, is really a
great blessing to the mass of those who wish to invest
moderate sums as a protection against age or calamity. In
those countries where such opportunities exist, it removes
all temptation to invest small sums in these enterprises,
which, however necessary for the public, such small owners
can but poorly afford to aid in carrying forward, and which
consequently should in justice either be guaranteed or owned
by the State, or at all events aided by State credit, when
they become indispensable for the public convenience."
Upon the subject of eminent domain Redfield says:
"That railways are but improved highways, and are of such
public use as to justify the exercise of the right of
eminent domain, by the sovereign, in their construction, is
now almost universally conceded."
Kent says in his "Commentaries on American Law":
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account