The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abusesLarrabee, William
History
The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abuses
Larrabee, William
Railroads; Railroads -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Mr. T. B. Blackstone, president of the Chicago and Alton Railroad
Company, has recently created somewhat of a surprise by declaring in
favor of Government ownership of railroads. That Mr. Blackstone's
programme will eventually receive the approval of a large number of his
colleagues there can be but little doubt. With the people wide-awake
upon this subject, the opportunities for railroad speculation are
lessening, and the scheme to early unload the railroads of the country
on the Government at a highly inflated value speaks well for the
financial farsightedness of its author. Mr. Blackstone proposes to have
railroad stockholders do here what the former owners of the telegraph
did in Great Britain, _i. e._, dispose of their property to the
Government, at a price representing several times its original cost or
even several times the cost of duplication.
Mr. C. Wood Davis, formerly general freight and passenger agent of one
of the leading roads east from Chicago, is one of the best informed and
clearest-headed writers upon the railroad question. He has, after much
experience and long study, been converted to the advocacy of national
ownership as a solution of the railroad problem. In a recent article
published by the Arena Publishing Company, entitled "Should the Nation
own the Railways?" he presents the objections and advantages of national
ownership. He says:
"The objections to national ownership are many, that most
frequently advanced, and having the most force, being the
possibility that, by reason of its control of a vastly
increased number of civil servants, the party in possession
of the Federal administration at the time such ownership was
assumed would be able to perpetuate its power
indefinitely.... This objection would seem to be well taken,
and indicates serious and far-reaching results unless some
way can be devised to neutralize the political power of such
a vast addition to the official army.... In the military
service we have a body of men that exerts little or no
political power, as the moment a citizen enters the army he
divests himself of political functions; and it is not
hazardous to say that 700,000 capable and efficient men can
be found who, for the sake of employment, to be continued so
long as they are capable and well behaved, will forego the
right to take part in political affairs. If a sufficient
number of such men can be found, this objection would, by
proper legislation, be divested of all its force....
"2. That there would be constant political pressure to make
places for the strikers of the party in power, thus adding a
vast number of useless men to the force, and rendering it
progressively more difficult to effect a change in the
political complexion of the administration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account