The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abusesLarrabee, William
History
The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abuses
Larrabee, William
Railroads; Railroads -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
"That this objection has much less force than is claimed is
clear from the conduct of the postal department, which is
unquestionably a political adjunct of the administration;
yet but few useless men are employed, while its conduct of
the mail service is a model of efficiency after which the
corporate-managed railways might well pattern. Moreover, if
the railways are put under non-partisan control, this
objection will lose nearly, if not quite, all its force.
"3. That the service would be less efficient and cost more
than with continued corporate ownership. This appears to be
bare assertion, as from the very nature of the case there
can be no data outside those furnished by the
government-owned railways of the British colonies, and such
data negative these assertions; and the advocates of
national ownership are justified in asserting that such
ownership would materially lessen the cost, as any expert
can readily point out many ways in which the enormous costs
of corporate management would be lessened. With those
familiar with present methods, and not interested in their
perpetuation, this objection has no force whatever.
"4. That with constant political pressure unnecessary lines
would be built for political ends. This is also bare
assertion, although it is not impossible that such results
would follow; yet such has not been the case in the British
colonies where the governments have had control of
construction....
"5. That, with the amount of red tape that will be in use,
it will be impossible to secure the building of needed
lines. While such objection is inconsistent with the fourth,
it may have some force, but as the greater part of the
country is already provided with all the railways that will
be needed for a generation, it is not a very serious
objection even if it is as difficult as asserted to procure
the building of the new lines. It is not probable, however,
that the Government would refuse to build any line that
would clearly subserve public, convenience, the conduct of
the postal service negativing such a supposition....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account