The Railway Builders: A Chronicle of Overland Highways — John Shaqi
The Railway Builders: A Chronicle of Overland HighwaysSkelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
History
The Railway Builders: A Chronicle of Overland Highways
Skelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
Pacific railroads; Railroads -- Canada -- History
On behalf of the English promoters it was urged that the Canadian
promoters could not raise the necessary capital, that the
Galt-Holton-Macpherson subscription was a fake, that the English
contractors could induce capitalists to invest freely at low rates, and
that their superior methods would result in a road of more solid
construction and lower working expenses than the ordinary American
railway. Holton and Galt, on the other hand, contended that their
subscription was in good faith, that tenders were in, and that with
provincial guarantee and municipal aid, and by paying the contractors
partly in stock, they could finance the road. It would be better, they
urged, to have the control in the hands of men who knew the province
rather than in the hands of outsiders. The Grand Trunk Company,
seeking incorporation, was only a {75} sham company, under the thumb of
the contractors, formed to ratify a foregone contract with them. If
the Montreal and Kingston Company was given control, it would invite
the Brassey firm to tender on the same basis as other contractors: no
more could honestly be asked.
Galt and Holton had the best of the argument, but Hincks had the votes,
and rumours which Jackson spread of the Brassey millions and the firm's
open door to all the money markets of Europe brought conviction or
afforded excuse. The railway committee reported in favour of the
English promoters, though the competition had compelled them to reduce
their price by a thousand pounds a mile, and to accept a guarantee of
L3000 per mile instead of half the cost. At the same time the Brassey
firm secured a charter for the Grand Trunk of Canada East, to run from
Quebec to Trois Pistoles--Canada's first section of the Halifax to
Quebec route. The same aggressive firm had already secured a contract
for the Quebec and Richmond, which was to join the St Lawrence and
Atlantic at Richmond, and, as has been seen, for New Brunswick and Nova
Scotia roads. With these contracts seemingly secure, Jackson sailed
for {76} home. But Canadian promoters were quick to learn. Galt had
another card to play. As president of the St Lawrence and Atlantic he
proposed to amalgamate this road with the Montreal and Kingston, and to
build a bridge at Montreal, thus securing an essential part of the
trunk line. Hincks became alarmed at the Montreal interests thus
arrayed against him, and proposed as a compromise that the Grand Trunk
should absorb the St Lawrence road and build the bridge at Montreal on
the condition that the opposition to its westward plans should be
abandoned. Upon this all parties agreed, and the English and Canadian
promoters joined forces.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account