The Railway Builders: A Chronicle of Overland HighwaysSkelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
History
The Railway Builders: A Chronicle of Overland Highways
Skelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
Pacific railroads; Railroads -- Canada -- History
What were the reasons for this disappointing result? The root of the
trouble was that the road was not built solely or even mainly with a
view to operating efficiency and earning power. It was the
politicians' road, the promoters' road, the contractors' road, at least
as much as the shareholders' road. The government had encouraged the
building of {83} unprofitable sections, such as that east of Quebec,
for local or patriotic reasons. Promoters had unloaded the Portland
road and later the Detroit and Port Huron road at excessive prices.
The contractors, east of Toronto, had had an eye mainly to construction
profits in planning the route, and heavy grades, bad rails, and poor
ballast increased maintenance charges beyond all expectations. The
prophecy that operating expenses would not exceed forty per cent of
earnings, based on English experience, failed partly because earnings
were lower, but more because operating expenses were higher, than
anticipated. The company had more than its share of hard luck from
commercial depression, and from loss on American paper money in the
Civil War. Water competition proved serious in the east, while other
railways waged traffic wars in Upper Canada. The trade of the far
west, which had been the most attractive lure, did not come in any
great amount for the first twenty years. Differences of gauge, lack of
permanent connections at Chicago, lack of return freight, rate wars
with the American roads which had been built west at the same time or
later, the inferiority of Montreal to New York as of old in harbour
facilities and {84} ocean service, the failure of Portland to become a
great commercial centre--all meant hope and dividends deferred.
Finally, the management was working at long range: the road did not
enjoy the vigilant inspection or the public support that would have
attended control by Canadian interests.
The Grand Trunk did Canada good service, well worth all the public aid
that was given. It would probably have given better service, and its
shareholders could not have fared worse, had the plans of Galt and his
associates not been interfered with, and the line been built gradually
under local control.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account