Domestic fiction; Family -- England -- Midlands -- Fiction; Midlands (England) -- Fiction
“He!—why, he’s just a bully,” said Miss Schofield, raising her shamed
dark eyes, that flamed with tortured contempt. “He’s not bad as long as
you keep in with him, and refer to him, and do everything in his
way—but—it’s all so _mean!_ It’s just a question of fighting on both
sides—and those great louts——”
She spoke with difficulty and with increased bitterness. She had
evidently suffered. Her soul was raw with ignominy. Ursula suffered in
response.
“But why is it so horrid?” she asked, helplessly.
“You can’t do _anything,”_ said Miss Schofield. “He’s against you on
one side and he sets the children against you on the other. The
children are simply awful. You’ve got to _make_ them do everything.
Everything, everything has got to come out of you. Whatever they learn,
you’ve got to force it into them—and that’s how it is.”
Ursula felt her heart fail inside her. Why must she grasp all this, why
must she force learning on fifty-five reluctant children, having all
the time an ugly, rude jealousy behind her, ready to throw her to the
mercy of the herd of children, who would like to rend her as a weaker
representative of authority. A great dread of her task possessed her.
She saw Mr. Brunt, Miss Harby, Miss Schofield, all the school-teachers,
drudging unwillingly at the graceless task of compelling many children
into one disciplined, mechanical set, reducing the whole set to an
automatic state of obedience and attention, and then of commanding
their acceptance of various pieces of knowledge. The first great task
was to reduce sixty children to one state of mind, or being. This state
must be produced automatically, through the will of the teacher, and
the will of the whole school authority, imposed upon the will of the
children. The point was that the headmaster and the teachers should
have one will in authority, which should bring the will of the children
into accord. But the headmaster was narrow and exclusive. The will of
the teachers could not agree with his, their separate wills refused to
be so subordinated. So there was a state of anarchy, leaving the final
judgment to the children themselves, which authority should exist.
So there existed a set of separate wills, each straining itself to the
utmost to exert its own authority. Children will never naturally
acquiesce to sitting in a class and submitting to knowledge. They must
be compelled by a stronger, wiser will. Against which will they must
always strive to revolt. So that the first great effort of every
teacher of a large class must be to bring the will of the children into
accordance with his own will. And this he can only do by an abnegation
of his personal self, and an application of a system of laws, for the
purpose of achieving a certain calculable result, the imparting of
certain knowledge. Whereas Ursula thought she was going to become the
first wise teacher by making the whole business personal, and using no
compulsion. She believed entirely in her own personality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account