The Rangers; or, The Tory's Daughter: A Tale Illustrative of the Revolutionary History of Vermont and the Northern Campaign of 1777Thompson, Daniel P. (Daniel Pierce)
History
The Rangers; or, The Tory's Daughter: A Tale Illustrative of the Revolutionary History of Vermont and the Northern Campaign of 1777
Thompson, Daniel P. (Daniel Pierce)
Vermont -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Fiction
“Why is it, Sabrey,” said the old gentleman, with an air of
petulance, and without deigning any direct answer to the troublesome
question,--“why is it that you cannot take the opinion of your friends,
who know so much more than you do about these matters, instead of
raising, as I have noticed you have lately seemed inclined to do,
questions which seem to imply doubts of the correctness of the measures
of our gracious sovereign and his wise ministers?”
“Why, father,” replied the other, with an ingenuous, but somewhat
abashed look, “if I have raised such questions, in relation to the
quarrel between the colonies and the mother country, I have gone on the
ground that the party which has the most right on its side would, of
course, have the best reasons for its measures; and as I have not always
been able to perceive good reasons for all the king's measures, I had
supposed you would be proud to give them.”
The old gentleman, though evidently disturbed and angry at this reply,
did not seem inclined to push the debate any further with his daughter.
The other gentlemen, also, looked rather glum; and for many moments not
a word was spoken; when the other young lady, who had not yet spoken,
after glancing round on the gentlemen in seeming expectation that those
better reasons would be given, at length ventured to remark,--
“Well, for my part, it is enough for me that my friends all belong to
the loyal party; and whatever might be said, I know I should always feel
that they were in the right, and their opposers in the wrong.”
“And in that, Jane, I think you are wise,” responded Jones, with an
approving smile. “The complaints of these disaffected people are based
on mistaken notions. They are too ill informed, I fear, to appreciate
the justice and necessity of the measures of our ministers, or to
understand very clearly what they are quarrelling about.”
“Ah, that is it,” warmly responded Haviland. “That is what I have always
said of them. They don't understand their own rights, or what is for
their own good, and should be treated accordingly. And I think some of
our leading men miss it in trying to reason with them. Reason with them!
Ridiculous! As if the common people could understand an argument!”
“You are perfectly right, squire,” responded Peters, with eager
promptness. “My own experience among the lower classes fully confirms
your opinion. My business, for several years past, has brought me often
in contact with them, in a certain quarter; and I have found them
not only ignorant of what properly belongs to their own rights and
privileges, but jealous and obstinate to a degree that is excessively
annoying.”
“Friend Peters probably alludes to his experience in the great republic
of Guilford,” said Jones, archly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account