The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and TechnologyLevy, Stanley Isaac
Science
The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and Technology
Levy, Stanley Isaac
Rare earths
In the works of Bauer, Rosenbusch, Weinschenk, Schilling and Iddings
will be found accounts of a mineral named ‘Hussakite.’ These accounts
rested on the work of Kraus and Reitinger,[112] who in 1901 announced
the discovery of a new species. The crystals were obtained as a specimen
of xenotime by Prof. Muthmann from Dr. E. Hussak, in São Paulo, and had
the crystallographic properties of that mineral. On analysis, the amount
of sulphur trioxide present was found to be remarkably high (6·3 per
cent.), and Kraus and Reitinger concluded that the substance was
distinct from xenotime. They announced it as a new mineral, with the
name Hussakite, and the formula 3R₂O₃,3P₂O₅,SO₃ or 6RPO₄,SO₃, and stated
that by the action of dilute alkalies the sulphur trioxide could be
easily and completely removed. They therefore regarded xenotime as a
pseudomorph[113] after hussakite, the sulphur trioxide having been
removed from the latter by the action of the alkaline waters of the
earth’s crust. In support of this view, they gave analyses of opaque
crystals from a Bahia sand represented as containing 2·6 to 2·7 per
cent. of sulphur trioxide, and so as being intermediate forms produced
during the change.
[112] _Zeitsch. Kryst. Min._ 1901, ~34~, 268.
[113] One mineral is said to be pseudomorphous after another when the
first is produced from the second by a chemical change which proceeds
so slowly that the original structure and crystalline form are
unaltered (_i.e._ a change proceeding molecule by molecule). The
pseudomorph is usually opaque and shows clear signs of the alteration.
The latter conclusion was quickly challenged by Brögger, who found no
sulphur trioxide in a perfectly fresh and transparent xenotime from Åro
in Scandinavia. Brögger concluded that the Hussakite of Kraus and
Reitinger was an independent species of the formula 5YPO₄,(YSO₄)PO₃, and
that xenotime was not derived from it.
Basing his work on the barium chloride test given by Kraus and Reitinger
(see below) Rösler[114] declared that ‘Hussakite’ was a common accessory
constituent of igneous rocks, having been previously mistaken for
zircon, which it resembles in appearance and optical properties.
[114] _Zeitsch. Kryst. Min._ 1902, ~36~, 258.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account