The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and TechnologyLevy, Stanley Isaac
Science
The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and Technology
Levy, Stanley Isaac
Rare earths
The chemistry of the rare earth elements begins in the year 1794, with
Gadolin’s discovery of the new oxide ‘Ytterbia,’ for which the name
Yttria was subsequently proposed by Ekeberg, and generally adopted (see
Chapter I, and under Gadolinite, p. 35). The discovery of Ceria followed
in 1804 (see under Cerite, p. 32). The classical work of Mosander,
carried out between 1838 and 1842, showed the complex nature of the new
oxides. From ceria he separated three new earths, Ceria proper,
Lanthana, and Didymia. Yttria was shown to be a mixture of at least
three oxides, for which the names Yttria, Erbia, and Terbia were
proposed. These oxides were believed to have the general formula RO, by
analogy with the alkaline earths, which they were found to resemble in
many respects, notably in their strongly basic character.
The properties of the new oxides were examined during the next twenty
years by many chemists, the chief workers being Marignac, Rammelsberg,
and Hermann, but the next important advance was the investigation of the
absorption spectra of solutions of the rare earth salts, first suggested
by Gladstone in 1856, and developed more fully by Bunsen and Kirchhoff
in 1860 and the following few years. The introduction of the methods of
spectrum analysis furnished a very delicate and valuable method of
examining and identifying the various oxides, and so greatly assisted
the laborious processes of separation.
Sixteen elements (excluding thorium and zirconium) are at the present
time recognised as belonging to the rare earth group. With one or two
exceptions, these show the closest resemblance to one another, both in
chemical behaviour and in the properties of their compounds, so that the
difficulties of separating and purifying them are very great. They may
be said to form a series, in which the properties vary continuously but
gradually from member to member, so that no sharp differences are
anywhere perceptible. The method of division into groups is, therefore,
almost entirely one of convenience, and has arisen from the course which
the separations have followed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account