The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal Biography — John Shaqi
The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal BiographyRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal Biography
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Gladstone, W. E. (William Ewart), 1809-1898
Sir Francis Doyle describes a visit he paid to Gladstone at his father’s
house. ‘Whilst there,’ he writes, ‘I was very much struck with the
remarkable acuteness and great natural powers of Mr. Gladstone the
father. Under his influence, apparently, nothing was taken for granted
between the father and his sons. A succession of arguments on great
topics and small topics alike—arguments conducted with perfect good
humour, but also with the most implacable logic—formed the staple of the
family conversations. Hence, it was easy to see from what foundations
Mr. Gladstone’s skill as a debater was built up.’ Further illustrative
traits are supplied. For instance, one of the amusements of the place
was shooting with bows and arrows. The arrows were lost in the long
grass; Sir Francis would have left them to chance and time. Not so Mr.
Gladstone. He insisted on their being all found. Again, on a trip to
Dunottar Castle, Mr. Gladstone was riding a skittish chestnut mare, who
would not let him open a gate in front of him. ‘My cob,’ Sir Francis
writes, ‘was perfectly docile, and quiet as a sheep. I naturally said,
“Let me do that for you.” But no; his antagonist had to be tamed, but it
took forty minutes to do so, and then the horsemen proceeded on their
way.’ It is said that Mr. Rarey, the horse-tamer, subsequently had a
high opinion of Mr. Gladstone’s skill as an equestrian.
CHAPTER III.
ENTERS PARLIAMENT.
In 1832 Mr. Gladstone left Oxford, and after spending six months in
Italy, he was recalled to England to become Member for Newark. In his
address he declared that the duties of governors are strictly and
peculiarly religious, and that legislators, like individuals, are bound
to carry throughout their acts the spirit of the high truths they have
acknowledged. Much required to be done for popular education, and labour
should receive adequate remuneration. He regarded slavery as sanctioned
by Holy Scripture, but he was in favour of the gradual education and
emancipation of the slaves. It was said that he was the Duke of
Newcastle’s nominee. He replied that he was nothing of the kind—that he
came there by the invitation of the Red Club, than whom none were more
respectable and intelligent. He was returned at the head of the poll.
Newark rejoiced in two members. Another Tory was second, and the Liberal
candidate, Serjeant Wilde, was defeated. Mr. Gladstone accordingly took
his seat in the first Reformed Parliament, which met in January, 1833.
His maiden speech was on the Anti-slavery Debate, to defend his father
from an attack made on him by Lord Howick with regard to the treatment of
his slaves in Demerara. On the morning of the debate, as he was riding
in Hyde Park, a passer-by pointed him out to another new member, Lord
Charles Russell, and said, ‘That is Gladstone; he is to make his maiden
speech to-night; that will be worth hearing.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account