If they, writing shortly after Jesus' death and, presumably, investigating all sources of information about His prophetic career--probably personally interviewing those persons then living who had seen, heard and known Jesus most intimately--had heard nothing of this story, then it must have been such an obscure legend, buried in the inner consciousness of so few people, as to be unworthy of serious consideration as a fact of history. If, on the other hand, these writers knew of the story, but, after investigation of the abundant sources of information at their command, rejected it as untrue, what warrant have subsequent historians, not possessing their special means of information, to claim that their decision was wrong? (c) The story of Jesus' supernatural paternity is most effectually discredited by the fact that no such claim on His behalf was advanced by, nor was the story known to, those nearest to Him during His lifetime. His nearest friends and neighbors, who had been in daily intercourse with Him at Nazareth for thirty years, had no suspicion of such a claim being made on His behalf, even some time after He had begun his preaching. "Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brethren James and Joseph and Simon and Judas?" (Matt. XIII:55; Mark VI:3.) (See also Matt. XII:47.) Still later, the multitudes who came to hear Him knew nothing of such a claim. "Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?" (John VI:42). Luke himself says that Jesus "was supposed" to be the son of Joseph (Luke III:23). There is, in fact, no evidence in the four Gospels to show that, during Jesus' lifetime, there was, at any time or place or by any person, a public claim made that He was not as much the son of Joseph, in the natural course of events, as He was the son of Mary. (d) _Jesus in His lifetime never denied the paternity of Joseph._ On one occasion, in the synagogue at Nazareth, when He had been preaching and the people "wondered" at His "gracious words," "they said, Is not this Joseph's son?" And He said unto them, among other things, "No prophet is accepted in his own country" (Luke IV:22, 23). That is, the people were loath to accept Jesus' teachings because of His lowly birth. But Jesus, instead of claiming a divine parentage, impliedly affirms the fatherhood of Joseph. On another occasion He is challenged as to His paternity, and does not deny that He is the son of Joseph (John VI:42). If He had believed that the Holy Ghost was His father, then these two utterances would have been a _suppressio veri_--the equivalent of a falsehood--of which we cannot think Him guilty.