The Real Question as to Altar Lights: Christ's Body Present by Consecration, and Offered in the Sacrament of the Altar: A Letter to the Rev. John W.H. Molyneux — John Shaqi
The Real Question as to Altar Lights: Christ's Body Present by Consecration, and Offered in the Sacrament of the Altar: A Letter to the Rev. John W.H. MolyneuxPhipps, Edward James
Religion
The Real Question as to Altar Lights: Christ's Body Present by Consecration, and Offered in the Sacrament of the Altar: A Letter to the Rev. John W.H. Molyneux
Phipps, Edward James
Church of England -- Doctrines; Lord's Supper -- Church of England; Ritualism
THE REAL QUESTION
AS TO
ALTAR LIGHTS.
CHRIST’S BODY PRESENT BY CONSECRATION, AND
OFFERED IN THE SACRAMENT OF THE ALTAR.
A LETTER
TO
THE REV. JOHN W. H. MOLYNEUX,
BY
EDWARD J. PHIPPS,
RECTOR OF STANSFIELD.
LONDON:
LONGMANS, GREEN, READER AND DYER.
SUDBURY: HENRY S. PRATT.
1865.
_Stansfield Rectory, Oct. 13th, 1865._
MY DEAR MR. MOLYNEUX,
I have read with much interest your correspondence with the Bishop
of Ely on the subject of Altar Lights, and as the course which the
Bishop has taken, makes it of serious importance to every clergyman,
especially to those in the diocese of Ely, I have been giving it my
best consideration.
I believe the facts were as follows:--The Bishop had given notice to
hold a confirmation in S. Peter’s Church, Sudbury, on the 1st May last,
being the festival of S. Philip and S. James.
According to your custom you prepared for the celebration of the Holy
Communion, and as the Bishop was staying at your house, informed him of
it, of course anticipating his attendance.
His Lordship, however, intimated that he understood you had Lights
on the Altar at the Communion, that he objected to them, and in
consequence, after discussing the matter with you, ended by absenting
himself altogether from the service.
Some time after, his Lordship sends you Dr. Twiss’s opinion as given
in your correspondence--pronounces Altar Lights illegal, and informs
you that though he acquits you of wilful disobedience on account of
your ignorance of the Law, yet that no other course was open to him but
that which he had adopted, viz., to abstain from Communion with you,
and therefore in future, with any other clergyman who may presume to
introduce or retain them.
I am moreover informed that in accordance with this arrangement, his
Lordship has intimated his intention to transfer the place of holding
his visitation at Sudbury, from S. Peter’s to All Saints, that is
to say from a Church where to say nothing more, Morning and Evening
Prayer are said daily throughout the year, to a Church where this most
positive and essential Law of the Church, is wholly and habitually set
at nought.
I certainly had not considered that the question of Altar Lights was of
such vital importance. The Bishop has not even personal knowledge of
their being used, and yet without even complaint made, without legal
investigation or trial, you are at once subjected to the heaviest
punishment it is in the power of the Church to inflict--you are cut off
from Communion with your Bishop, _ipso facto_ excommunicate.
This result makes it, I repeat, highly important that it should be
thoroughly ascertained, whether and upon what grounds Altar Lights are
illegal.
I believe the ordinary authority quoted for the use of Altar Lights, is
that they were “in use” in the second year of Edward VI., and that the
Rubric of our present Common Prayer, directs all such ornaments to be
retained, as were “in use” in that year by authority of Parliament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account