The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
To separate Shelley as far as possible from what he necessarily regards as
an awkward and humiliating affair, Mr. Garnett has recourse to a
representation which, instead of according with the probabilities of the
case, is discountenanced by several facts. 'It was but too clear,' says
the author of _Shelley in Pall Mall_, 'that Shelley's colleague, doubtless
under the compulsion of the poet's impetuous solicitations for more
verses, had appropriated whatever came first to hand, with slight respect
for pedantic considerations of _meum_ and _tuum_.' What evidence could Mr.
Garnett produce that the pilfered matter was put into the book, not by
Shelley but by his coadjutor? that the poet had pressed his coadjutor
impetuously for more verses? that, in consequence of his impetuous
solicitations for more verses, Shelley's coadjutor took verses out of a
printed book, and palmed them off on him as verses of her own composition?
What evidence could Mr. Garnett produce that Shelley was unaware that the
volume of so-styled original verse contained poetry which had been
'appropriated ... with slight respect for pedantic considerations of
_meum_ and _tuum_?' No evidence of any kind, over and beyond these words
by the mendacious and rascally Stockdale:--
'I fully anticipated the probable vexation of the juvenile
maiden-author, when I communicated my discovery to Mr. P. B. Shelley.
With all the ardour, incidental to his character, which embraces
youthful honour in all its brilliancy, he expressed the warmest
resentment at the imposition, practised upon him, by his coadjutor,
and intreated me to destroy all the copies.'
Of Stockdale's motives of self-interest and vindictiveness, in writing of
Shelley in a laudatory style, something will be said by-and-by. For the
present it is enough to remind the reader that the concoctor of the
scandalous _Budget_ (1827) was writing from memory, more than sixteen
years after the incidents to which he refers. That Shelley's coadjutor was
spurred into wrongful action by 'the poet's impetuous solicitations for
more verses,' is a touch of fiction for which we are indebted to Mr.
Garnett's imagination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account