The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Having thus troubled and frightened the worthy woman, for no purpose,
except that he might execute an awkward and feeble pleasantry, the
gownsman, who liked to be talked about, pressed the baby's cheeks with his
fingers, and turned away saying to his companion, 'How provokingly close
are those new-born babes! But it is no less certain, notwithstanding their
cunning attempts to conceal the truth, that all knowledge is reminiscence:
the doctrine is far more ancient than the times of Plato, and as old as
the venerable allegory, that the Muses are the daughters of Memory; not
one of the Nine was ever said to be the child of Invention.'
Whilst the freshman amused himself at Oxford in ways glanced at in the
foregoing pages, how did he get on with the tutors of his college, and the
other academic authorities? That he had no cause to complain of their
treatment of him during the earlier weeks of his brief time at Oxford, he
admitted in clear and noteworthy terms, to the Etonian who inquired of him
in Hogg's hearing, 'Do you mean to be an Atheist here, too, Shelley?'
To this inquiry, whether he meant to worry, harass, and defy the tutors of
his college as he had worried, harassed, and defied the persons put in
authority over him at Eton, the University College freshman answered
decidedly, 'No! certainly not. There is no motive for it; there would be
no use in it; they are very civil to us here; they never interfere with
us; it is not like Eton.'
For the precise words of this reply, represented by Hogg as having been
made by Shelley, the biographer was doubtless indebted in some degree to
his imagination. But even the 'Shelleyan enthusiasts' will admit that the
tenor of the reply was something Hogg might have remembered. Bearing in
mind also that Hogg disliked the University College 'dons,' and held them
in bitter remembrance as the authors of his own academic disgrace, the
same enthusiasts will admit that he was not likely to have invented such a
piece of testimony to the general inoffensiveness of 'the dons' he
detested. Even by them, therefore, it will be admitted that at this early
point of his brief 'residence' in college, Shelley admitted that the
'dons' of University College treated him, as gentlemen in their position
should treat a gentleman in his position; that they did not 'interfere'
with him, that he had no grievance against them, or any grounds for
worrying them. They were not like the Eton masters. They were gentlemen.
This admission is the more noteworthy because Hogg (wildly wrong-headed
and considerably less than historically truthful in matters touching his
own and the poet's expulsion from University College) in his bitterness
against those same 'dons,' was at much pains to declare them no gentlemen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account