The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
description_,' is to hold that whilst believing in God Shelley wrote a
book to prove there was no God; that whilst believing in the existence of
the Deity he set himself deliberately to work, to force other people into
pure atheism. I cannot believe with Mr. Garnett, and Mr. Denis Florence
MacCarthy, that Shelley was capable of such amazing impiety. Nothing is
stranger in Shelley's story than that the hardest things said of him
should, in so many cases, be uttered by his extravagant idolaters. My
conception of the Oxonian Shelley is that he was an impetuous, unruly,
combative young scatterbrain; disloyal and deceitful to his parents;
certainly capable of falsehood in comparatively small matters to other
people; but I cannot believe he could have been so false to his own soul,
so prodigiously false to his own convictions on the most awful of all
solemn subjects, as to write and seek a publisher for a serious argument
against the belief in God, whilst he himself believed in the Deity.
Let us see from evidences, known to Mr. Garnett, when he wrote his
_Shelley in Pall Mall_, what were some of Shelley's views respecting God,
in the Christmas holidays of 1810-11. On 26th December, 1810, he writes to
Hogg from Field Place:--
'Thanks, _truly_ thanks, for opening your heart to me, for telling me
your feelings to me. Dare I do the same to you? I dare not to myself,
how can I to another, perfect as he may be. I dare not even to God,
whose mercy is great.'
On 3rd January, 1811, the future poet writes to the same correspondent:
'The word "God," a vague word, has been, and will continue to be, the
source of numberless errors, until it is erased from the nomenclature
of philosophy. Does it not imply "the soul of the universe, the
intelligent and necessarily beneficent, actuating principle." This it
is impossible not to believe in. I may not be able to adduce proofs;
but, I think, that the leaf of a tree, the meanest insect on which we
trample, are, in themselves, arguments more conclusive than [any]
which can be advanced [....] that some vast intellect animates
infinity. If we disbelieve this, the strongest argument in support of
the existence of a future state instantly becomes annihilated.'
Nine days later (12th January, 1811), the future poet writes from Field
Place:--
'I here take God (_and a God exists_) to witness, that I wish
torments, which beggar the futile description of a fancied hell, would
fall upon me; provided I could attain thereby that happiness for what
I love, which, I fear, can never be!... I wish, ardently wish, to be
profoundly convinced of the existence of a Deity, that so superior a
spirit might derive some degree of happiness from my feeble exertions;
for love is heaven, and heaven is love.... I think I can prove the
existence of a Deity--a First Cause.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account