The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
The fact, however, still remains that for some months before her death she
had passed from his sight. He had promised solemnly to cherish her (a
promise certainly within his power of accomplishing in some degree); and
it remains a fact that, instead of keeping his eye on her (as he intended
for a time to do) he suffered her to slip from his cognizance. Regard
being had to her age and the way in which he had uprooted her moral and
religious principles, few persons will hesitate in saying, that he was
under peculiar obligations to ‘look after her,’ and be ready at any moment
to come to her aid, however bad her conduct either before or after their
separation. He is not to be judged in this business as one would judge an
ordinary man, whose wife plunges into immorality of her own free will, and
in obedience to influences and circumstances in no degree referable to his
action. Shelley’s exceptional treatment of his wife placed him under
exceptional obligations to stand by her and befriend her throughout life.
Had he been the superlatively chivalrous and virtuous man his eulogists
declare him, he would have felt this and acted steadily in accordance with
the feeling.
Though most of the ascertained facts touching Mrs. Shelley’s suicide have
been withheld from the public, we are assured by Shelleyan apologists that
the fatal incident was not directly consequent on any action by the
husband, who had for some months lost sight of her. But to relieve Shelley
of the obloquy of being the immediate, is not to relieve him of the shame
of being the indirect, cause of his wife’s death. Following in the steps
of previous writers, Mr. Froude does Shelley the disservice of insisting
that he did not blame himself for his wife’s death. ‘Nor,’ Mr. Froude
adds, ‘did the family lawyers blame him, who knew the facts of the story;’
‘the family lawyers,’ thus produced as witnesses to character, being the
one lawyer Longdill (Shelley’s attorney, _not_ the attorney of the
family). By the _Edinburgh_ ‘Shelley-and-Mary’ reviewer, attention is
called to the fact, that at this dismal moment of his story, Shelley’s
‘friends, Hookham, Longdill, and Leigh Hunt supported him by their
approval.’ What supporters, at such a crisis, for the author of _Alastor_,
the man of superb genius, soon to be the author of _Prometheus
Unbound_!--a bookseller, an attorney, and a parasite!--the bookseller, who
was making much, and hoped to make more money out of him; the attorney,
who knew nothing of the matter but what his not invariably accurate
client had been pleased to tell him; and the parasite, who, after
sucking thousands from Shelley during his life, sponged on his
representatives after his death! What witnesses and what testimony!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account