The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Readers need not think so ill of Shelley as Mr. Froude does. It is certain
that Shelley did reproach himself bitterly for his conduct towards
Harriett. The biographical evidence is superabundant that he endured the
keen remorse that is ever attended with self-reproach. How could it be
otherwise? When the lifeless body was fished out of the Serpentine, six
years had not fully passed since Shelley paid his first visit to
Harriett’s home, bearing his sister’s gift for her favourite
school-fellow; only five years and two or three months had passed since he
carried her off, bright and winsome, in her untarnished virginal
loveliness. How could he think of the thing he had made her without
torture? He may well have been appalled at the moment, and in the
after-time been agonized by the consequences of his boyish heedlessness.
That he was capable, not long after her death, of calling her ‘a frantic
idiot,’ is no evidence that he escaped the anguish that is the inevitable
punishment of wrong done in mere thoughtlessness, no less than of wrong
resulting from heartlessness. The bitterness of the indecent speech was
the mere mask of decent and keen regret.
There is, however, no evidence that he suffered aught more than a man of
sensibility would inevitably suffer from so ghastly an incident. The story
(believed by the _Quarterly_ Reviewer of October, 1861) that dismay at
Harriett’s death and grief for her, whose lot he had taken so peculiarly
into his own hands, rendered him ‘actually insane’ for a time, was a pure
fiction. During the brief interval between the recovery of Harriett’s
corpse from the Serpentine and his marriage to Mary he was in constant
correspondence with Peacock through the post; and the letters Peacock
received from him and Mary at that time were conclusive proof, that
remorse did not so completely overpower him before his second marriage.
The first to tell Peacock of Harriett’s death, Shelley at the same time
asked his (at that time) closest male friend, whether propriety required
him to defer for any considerable period his formal marriage with
Mary,--an inquiry that caused Peacock to advise him to marry her promptly.
Three full weeks had not passed since Harriett’s corpse was fished out of
the water when (on 30th December, 1816) Shelley was married privately to
Mary Godwin at St. Mildred’s Church, Bread Street, in the presence of her
father and step-mother. On visiting Peacock shortly after the marriage,
Shelley (though no doubt suffering secretly from the events so closely
preceding his second marriage) showed conclusively by his demeanour, that
he was not overpowered by regretful recollections of his first wife.
Reasonably incensed at the knavish gardener, who had lopt the fine old
wide-spreading holly-tree of the Marlow Garden to a bare pole, Shelley
displayed strong emotion at nothing else. ‘Shelley,’ says Peacock, ‘stayed
with me two or three days. I never saw him more calm and self-possessed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account