The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
How are this statement and the superabundant evidence of its accuracy
dealt with by one of the several gentlemen who, not content with
white-washing and painting Shelley into a respectable member of a
respectable county family, and white-washing Mary Godwin into a suitable
wife for so respectable a member of so respectable a county family, must
needs whitewash Shelley’s second mother-in-law into a suitable mother for
so suitable a wife for so respectable a member of so highly respectable a
county family? In his _Life of William Godwin_, Mr. Kegan Paul ventures to
say that ‘Mr. Knowles is so extremely inaccurate in regard to all else
that he says of her, that his testimony,’ respecting Mary Wollstonecraft’s
intimacy with Fuseli, ‘may be wholly set aside.’ This astounding statement
is made by a gentleman who does not give a single fact in support of the
baseless charge of inaccuracy. It is directly the reverse of fact that Mr.
Knowles is extremely inaccurate in what he says about Mary Wollstonecraft.
In the memoir of Mary, forming the preface of his edition of her _Letters
to Imlay_, Mr. Kegan Paul calls Knowles’s careful and accurate statement a
‘preposterous story,’ _i.e._ a story contrary to nature and reason; a
wrong, foolish, monstrous, absurd story. Fortunately Mr. Kegan Paul gives
his reasons for thus stigmatizing a truthful story and conscientious
writer. (1) Mr. Kegan Paul says, ‘I have failed to find any confirmation
whatever of this preposterous story.’ (2) He says, ‘I find much which
makes directly against it, the strongest fact being that Mary remained to
the end the correspondent and close friend of Mrs. Fuseli.’ What reasons
for declaring the story ‘preposterous’! It is proved completely, proved
(as the phrase goes) up to the very hilt; but it must be false because Mr.
Kegan Paul has failed to discover any additional confirmatory evidence of
its truth,--evidence needed by no discreet reader. It must be false,
because Mrs. Fuseli corresponded with Mary to the last! This is Mr. Kegan
Paul’s _strongest fact, making directly against_ the statement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account