The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
What are Mr. Kegan Paul’s grounds for saying that a legal marriage with
Imlay was certainly difficult, apparently impossible, to Mary
Wollstonecraft in Paris, in the spring of 1793? His grounds for this quite
erroneous opinion are (1) that she was a British subject; (2) that
England and France were at war; (3) that her position as a British subject
was full of danger; (4) that even if a marriage with Imlay was possible to
her, she could not have made it without declaring her nationality to the
civil officer; (5) that in Madame de Stael’s novel of _Corinne_, Lord
Nelvil could not marry Madame d’Arbigny, because to marry her he would
have had to declare himself to the civil officer. In answer to these
considerations, it is enough to say (1) that, though she was a British
subject, Mary Wollstonecraft, as the child and favourer of revolution, and
a famous writer, enjoying the friendship of Thomas Paine, and other
powerful members of the National Convention, was in the spring of 1793
exempt from the perils and inconveniences pertaining to ordinary British
subjects living at that time in Paris; (2) that, even had her position
been perilous, it would not have been rendered more so by the declarations
requisite for a marriage, as so celebrated an Englishwoman, living openly
in Paris, was already well known to the civil functionaries; (3) that the
case of the English noble_man_ in Madame de Stael’s novel does not apply
to circumstances of the English_woman_ in Paris,--Mary being a woman
already known to the civil officer, and a woman, whose nationality would,
on the moment of marriage, merge in the nationality of her husband, and
remain therein during coverture. Mr. Kegan Paul is wrong alike in his
facts and his law. Though she was at war with England, France was in
cordial alliance with the United States of America; and the citizen of
those States could have married Mary Wollstonecraft almost as easily in
Paris as he could have married her in New York. Mr. Kegan Paul’s
hypothesis that Mary might have found it difficult and perilous to marry
Imlay is a mere fancy, arising from misconceptions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account