Alexandra, Empress, consort of Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 1872-1918
“Ah ... it’s quite possible, Lili. I drove past you, and bowed to you
many times, but you wouldn’t recognise me. Tell me in what I’ve offended
you.” And he continued to tease me until I felt ready to die with
confusion. He loved his wife: no one has ever dared dispute the quality
of the affection which existed between them; theirs was an ideal
love-marriage, and when their love was tried in the furnace of
affliction it was not found wanting.
Nicholas II had been reproached for his weakness of character, but this
weakness was not weakness in the literal sense. The Empress, who was
fully aware of what was said concerning the Emperor and herself, once
told me how utterly people misunderstood her husband. “He is accused of
weakness,” she said bitterly. “He is the strongest--not the weakest. I
assure you, Lili, that it cost the Emperor a tremendous effort to
subdue the attacks of rage to which the Romanoffs are subject. He has
learnt the hard lesson of self-control, only to be called weak; people
forget that the greatest conqueror is he who conquers himself.”
On another occasion she remarked that she knew that the Emperor and
herself were blamed for not surrounding themselves with genuine people.
“It’s an extraordinary thing, Lili,” she said, “we’ve tried to find
genuine advisers for the last twenty years, but we’ve never found them.
I wonder whether any exist!”
The Empress always resented the cruel slanders which were circulated
about the Emperor.
“I wonder they don’t accuse him of being too good: that, at least, would
be true!” she cried.
As for herself, she troubled little.
“Why do people want to discuss me,” she said. “Why _can’t_ they leave me
alone!” Again: “Why will people insist that I am pro-German? I have
spent twenty years in Germany, and twenty years in Russia. My interests,
and my son’s future lie in Russia: how, therefore, can I be anything but
Russian?”
The Empress has been censured for exerting undue influence over her
husband, and this “pernicious” influence has made her the scapegoat for
all the ills which have befallen Russia. But her “influence” was merely
that of a good woman over a man. If she influenced the Emperor in any
other way, it was done unconsciously. I will never believe otherwise,
although, in making this assertion, I shall perhaps be confronted with
all kinds of hostile criticism. It will be asked by what right I dare
defend a woman who has been tried and found guilty. But I dare to do so.
True, I am a person whose name is entirely unknown to the general
public, but it cannot be disputed by those who knew life at Tsarkoe Selo
and Petrograd that I was honoured by the Empress’s friendship and
confidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account