American National Red Cross; Red Cross and Red Crescent
signatory powers to the Red Cross Treaty of Geneva, having given its
adhesion as long ago as July, 1865, it must consequently be familiar
with its methods and humanitarian ideas. Thus it was hoped that she
would the more readily accept its presence than that of a more strange
body of workers. These are only a shadowing of the reasons urged on
behalf of our acceptance. Under this pressure, coupled with our strong
sympathies, the subject was taken into serious consideration with the
simple demand on our part of two positive assurances: First, we must be
assured by the committees that we were the choice of the people of the
entire country, that there was no opposition to us, and that there was
perfect unanimity between themselves; there must be nowhere any discord;
the task would be difficult enough under the best conditions. Second,
that they had the funds to distribute. Assured on both these points, our
promise was given that we would go and do our best to make the desired
distribution in the interior of Asia Minor.
With this ray of hope that something might be done, the pent-up
sympathies of the people burst forth. Public meetings were held,
addresses made, Armenian conditions estimated, horrors reproduced,
responsibilities placed, causes canvassed, and opinions expressed;
honest, humane, and entirely natural, precisely the course to rouse
public sentiment and indignation, if that were the only or the main
object in view. In consideration, however, of the relief effort, it was
of questionable wisdom perhaps, when it is borne in mind that we had yet
to ask the opening of a door hitherto closed against the world, when we
needed permission to enter, in order to reach the starving sufferers
with the relief that was planning for them. In the enthusiasm of the
hour, this fact seemed to be entirely lost sight of. It also seemed to
be forgotten that if this difficult and delicate task were to be
assigned to the Red Cross and its officers, that the making of their
mission or of themselves personally, prominent or laudatory features of
public gatherings where Ottoman officials or representatives were always
listeners, could not fail to render the post more difficult, and
prospects of success more doubtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account