Saint Petersburg (Russia) -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921
Many of the crews simply arrested their officers, and some asked them
to sign a paper declaring they would support the Revolution. As nearly
as I can learn, sixty-five men were killed on the Baltic Sea Fleet, and
a hundred on the Black Sea Fleet. The first day of the Revolution, the
sailors revenged themselves on the whole order of discipline, and it
was hot blood that determined life and death. When the committee was
formed, the killing was stopped.
At the time of the Korniloff rebellion, four officers belonging to
one of the ships were taken out and killed, against the protest of
the Central Committee. Once more the sailors, maddened by what they
believed to be an attack on the Revolution, took things into their own
hands. They put three questions to their officers:
“Do you belong to the Soviet and Kerensky, or Korniloff?
“If Korniloff takes Petrograd, will you go to take it from him?
“If Korniloff tells you to go to Petrograd and fight the Provisional
Government, will you go?”
Their answers to these questions saved or cost them their lives. The
sailors formed their own committee and pronounced the death sentence.
The lot of the naval officer in Russia was no more enviable than that
of the army officer; but it was a direct and logical result of the
régime that made masters of the few and slaves of the many.
[Illustration: Korniloff, his staff and Cossack bodyguard from the
“Wild Division”]
[Illustration: Bicycle troops to the rescue of Kerensky]
[Illustration: Baltic sailors’ bayonets speak for the Soviet]
[Illustration: A dining-room in the Matrosski Klub (Sailors’ Club),
Helsingfors]
At Viborg and at some of the other points, the fate of the officers
was far worse than at Helsingfors, and the stories told about the
deaths they died are not pretty ones. The training and tradition of a
naval officer unfitted him for faith in the new order, contradicted
the belief of a lifetime and the heritage of generations. The chasm
that yawned between officers and men was too wide to be bridged in a
day. A few made an honest effort to cross over it, and the men seemed
pathetically grateful to them. Others took orders from the sailors for
the same reason that the sailors had once taken orders from them--they
were afraid to do otherwise. Some were merely biding their time,
convinced that the topsy-turvy order would change and they would come
into their “own” again. But one thing was evident here as elsewhere in
Russia: that, whatever happens, nobody’s “own” will ever again be quite
what it has been in the past.
Admiral Verderevsky, the Minister of Marine, said that discipline
was destroyed at its root not at the moment of the Revolution, but
long before; that new and democratic forms should have been created
long ago; and that it could never be restored by the lash or the
guillotine. Verderevsky blamed former Minister of War Goutchkoff for
lack of discipline in the navy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account