The regiments of the British Army, chronologically arranged
History
The regiments of the British Army, chronologically arranged
Great Britain. Army
Take the 27th Inniskilling, a Regiment essentially Irish in its
character and composition, “linked” to the 108th Madras Infantry. What
connection the person entrusted with a matter of such vital importance
could see in these two Regiments is quite beyond the imagination of a
soldier, and gives rise to the idea that he must have drawn them out of
a hat. The 27th has a glorious history of two centuries; the 108th was
only raised by the East India Company in 1854, and has no more to do
with Ireland than the Russian Guards.
Look at the 31st Huntingdonshire and the 70th Surrey “linked” together
at Kingston. Is every Huntingdonshire man who wishes to join his county
Regiment to walk all the way to Kingston to enlist? and when he does
so, be uncertain whether he is to wear the Huntingdon buff or the
Surrey black?
Had only the depôt of the 35th Royal Sussex been localized at
Chichester to obtain recruits for that regiment, it would have been
perfect; as it is, the “Brigade Depôt” at that city is partly formed of
two nominal companies of the 107th Bengal Infantry, which Regiment of
course never had the slightest connection with the county of Sussex.
The two depôts, or four nominal companies, form the “43rd Brigade
Depôt.” It surely might have been numbered the “35th Brigade Depôt,”
and so have kept up a semblance of the old county number.
It follows, therefore, that a man of Sussex wishing to enlist in his
county Regiment, first has to go into the “43rd Brigade Depôt,” and
then may find himself in the 107th Bengal Infantry, which Regiment he
never intended to serve in at all!
But the above examples of ill-matched couples will suffice.
Is it wonderful that soldiers with the least gleam of _esprit de
corps_ desert?
The fact is, that the glorious old Regiments of the British Army are
in process of being improved off the face of the martial world, and if
the system of “Brigade Depôts” is persevered in, the Regiment must
eventually disappear.
Let anyone read the “General Order” of the 17th March 1873. It says--
“The single Battalion Regiments, which are linked together to form the
Line portion of a sub-district Brigade, will, so far as regards the
Sub-Lieutenants thereto appointed, and the soldiers therein enlisted,
after the date of this order, _constitute one corps_ for all
military purposes.
“All first appointments to the Line, and all enlistments for Line
service, will be for the particular Brigade, _instead of as
heretofore, for particular Regiments_.”
“The officers and soldiers who may be so appointed to any Brigade,
will, for relief, for all duties at home and abroad, and for every
military purpose whatsoever, _and in whatever ranks they may
thereafter respectively hold, be interchangeable between the Line
Battalions of their Brigade, and will be liable to serve in either
of those Battalions indifferently, without regard to the particular
Battalion to which they may have been first appointed to serve_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account