The Reign of Andrew Jackson: A Chronicle of the Frontier in PoliticsOgg, Frederic Austin
History
The Reign of Andrew Jackson: A Chronicle of the Frontier in Politics
Ogg, Frederic Austin
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
By the last week of January it was rather generally understood that
Clay's strength would be thrown to Adams. Up to this time the Jackson
men had refused to believe that such a thing could happen. But evidence
had been piled mountain-high; adherents of both allies were openly
boasting of the arrangements that had been made. The Jacksonians were
furious, and the air was filled with recriminations. On January 28,
1825, an anonymous letter in the Columbian Observer of Philadelphia
made the direct charge that the agents of Clay had offered the
Kentuckian's support to both Jackson and Adams in return for an
appointment as Secretary of State, and that, while the friends of
Jackson would not descend to "such mean barter and sale," a bargain
with the Adams forces had been duly closed. Clay's rage was
ungovernable. Through the columns of the National Intelligencer he
pronounced his unknown antagonist "a base and infamous calumniator, a
dastard and a liar," called upon him to "unveil himself," and declared
that he would hold him responsible "to all the laws which govern and
regulate men of honor."
Two days later an obscure Pennsylvania Congressman by the name of
George Kremer tendered his respects to "the Honorable H. Clay," avowed
his authorship of the communication in question, offered to prove the
truth of his charges, and closed sententiously by affirming that as a
representative of the people he would "not fear to 'cry aloud and spare
not' when their rights and privileges are at stake." The matter was
serious, but official Washington could hardly repress a smile. Kremer
was a thoroughly honest but grossly illiterate rustic busybody who thus
far had attracted the capital's attention mainly by reason of his
curiously cut leopard-skin overcoat. The real author of the charge
seems to have been James Buchanan, and Kremer was simple-minded and
credulous enough to be made the catspaw in the business. Clay was taken
aback. Kremer significantly made no reference to the "code of honor";
and since a duel with such a personage would be an absurdity, Clay
substituted a request that the House make an immediate investigation of
the charges. A committee of seven was appointed. But when it summoned
Kremer to give his testimony, he refused to appear, on the
ground--which in the present instance was a mere pretext--that the
House had no jurisdiction over the conduct of its members outside the
chamber.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account