Social problems; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
Hence the elaborate, the complex, the awe-inspiring system of
precedence. Every one from the President and his family and their
remotest connection visiting Washington, down through all the branches
of official life to grand-niece of the scrubwoman who sees to the
basement steps of the smallest public building, has his or her exactly
defined and jealously guarded station in the social hierarchy.
Naturally, the most interesting part of the imposing structure that
descends tier on tier from the august and exalted Chief Magistrate, is
the court--the President, his Cabinet (Cabinet “ministers,” to give
them the fanciful title they love best), the ambassadors and ministers
and staffs of the various embassies and legations, the families
of all these, and this means the White House and the Lord Great
Chamberlain--the White House, the stage; the Lord Great Chamberlain,
the stage manager.
The White House was always inadequate--it would have been inadequate
only for carrying out the purely democratic idea of the Presidential
office, the idea set forth in the written laws. For the splendid,
imperial, democratic concept of the plutocracy, the White House was
ridiculous. Many a previous President and his wife, conscious of the
social possibilities of the Presidential office, and yearning to
develop them, have sighed over and moaned over and hinted about the
petty proportions of the “Executive Mansion.” But political timidity
restrained them from insisting upon expansion and elaboration. Mr.
Roosevelt, confident that the people understood and approved him, and
full of enthusiasm for his exalted concept of a new Presidency to suit
a new era of the republic, boldly ventured where other Presidents had
shrunk back. He demanded adequate quarters for the imperial-democratic
court. The result is a new White House, a fit theatre for plutocratic
social activities, a fit field for the operations of an energetic and
sympathetic Lord Great Chamberlain.
The present President entertains, not occasionally but constantly,
not exclusively but as democratically as an emperor, not meagrely but
lavishly, not a score of guests, but hundreds and thousands. He has
a multitude of guests to lunch, a multitude to dine, a multitude to
hear music or to take part in various kinds of “drawing-rooms” and
levees, a multitude to stay the night under his roof--not a multitude
all at one time, but a multitude in the aggregate. Rich and poor, snob
and democrat, plutocrat and proletarian, black and white, American
and foreigner, Maine woods guide, Western scout, fashionable and
frowzy--all equally welcome, all equal at his court. Morgan and Jacob
Riis, Countess de Castellane and Booker Washington, Wild Bill and
Bishop Potter, Duse and Rough Rider Rob, Alfred Henry Lewis and a New
York cotillon leader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account