Several of those who have discussed the relation of the Code to the laws of Moses have given translations based upon SCHEIL, WINCKLER, or MÜLLER. _The Hammurabi Code and the Sinaitic Legislation_, by CHILPERIC EDWARDS (London, Watts & Co., 1904), _The Codes of Hammurabi and_ _Moses_, W. W. DAVIES (New York, Eaton & Maine, 1905), _The Code of Hammurabi_, by C. H. W. JOHNS, in the Extra Volume of _A Dictionary of the Bible_ (Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1904), pp. 584-612, may be named. In the second and third editions of his excellent work, _The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia_ (London, S. P. C. K., 1903), T. G. PINCHES translated the Code (1903, pp. 487-536; 1908, pp. 487-538). The treatment is full of acute observation and accurate scholarship. A. UNGNAD has contributed a fresh translation to _Altorientalische Texte und Bilder zum alten Testamente, herausgegeben von_ H. GRESSMANN, _erster Band_, pp. 140-71 (Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr, 1909). V. DISCUSSIONS. All the above works contained more or less discussion of the Code from various points of view. In October, 1902, the present writer read a paper before the _Cambridge Theological Society_, an abstract of which appeared in the January number of the _Journal of Theological Studies_ (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1903). The Code was here dealt with as _material for comparison with the Laws of Moses_, but no comparison was made. A. UNGNAD wrote _Zur Syntax der Gesetze Hammurabis_ in vol. xvii of the _Zeitschrift für Assyriologie_, pp. 353-78 (Strassburg, K. J. Trübner, May, 1903), and again in vol. xviii, pp. 1-67. The text of the Code, by its careful phraseology and exact use of grammatical forms, has become a classic for the study of the language. The order of the sentence is, however, somewhat unusual, and probably shows the influence of the legal phraseology of the time, which was based on Sumerian law precedents. D. H. MÜLLER took up this point in _Die Wortfolge bei Hammurabi und die sumerische Frage_, an article in _Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes_, vol. xvii, pp. 337-42 (Wien, Hölder, 1904), followed by _Noch einmal die Wortfolge bei Hammurabi und die sumerische Frage_, vol. xviii, pp. 89-94. _Der Gebrauch der Modi in den Gesetzen Hammurabis_, xviii, pp. 95-8, by D. H. MÜLLER, appeared in the _Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes_ (Vienna, A. Hölder, 1904). In the _Zeitschrift für Assyriologie_, vol. xviii, pp. 202-22, S. DAICHES contributed a most important article, _Zur Erklärung des Hammurabi-Codex_ (1904). The same title was used by A. UNGNAD for an article in the _Wissenschaftliches Correspondenzblatt der Philologie—Novitates_ for October, 1906, pp. 8-9. In vol. xix of the _Zeitschrift für Assyriologie_, pp. 388-91, CHR. SARAUW took up the grammar of the Code in an article _Zum Kasus-System des Hammurabi-Kodex_, 1906.