The religion of Plutarch : $b A pagan creed of apostolic timesOakesmith, John
Religion
The religion of Plutarch : $b A pagan creed of apostolic times
Oakesmith, John
Plutarch -- Religion
Contemporary with the work of Aristotle and his insistence upon the
necessity that each individual man should seek for the chief good in
the sphere of his own actual experience, occurred the relaxation of
the dominant claims of the State to the best part of the energies and
activities of the citizen. The change in the political condition of
Greece consequent upon the Macedonian conquest had turned the Greek
citizen back upon his own soul for inspiration to guide his steps aright.
The philosophical tendency was thus aided by external conditions, and
the joint operation of both these influences established in Stoicism and
Epicureanism the satisfaction of the moral requirements of the individual
man as the aim and end of Philosophy.
Whatever importance the leaders of the Stoics attached to Logic and
Physics—and different philosophers formed different estimates of their
value[87]—all were agreed that these parts of Philosophy were only
useful in so far as they enabled mankind to lead a virtuous life; a life
in harmony with nature and its laws; a life which placed them above the
domination of “_Fear and hope and phantasy and awe, And wistful yearning
and unsated loves, That strain beyond the limits of this life_.”[88]
The Epicureans repudiated Dialectic,[89] and, as already stated,
studied Physics with a view only to freeing the mind of man from those
supernatural fears which hampered him in his attainment of terrestrial
virtue and happiness:—
“Nam veluti pueri trepidant atque omnia cæcis
In tenebris metuunt, sic nos in luce timemus
Interdum nilo quæ sunt metuenda magis quam
Quæ pueri in tenebris pavitant finguntque futura.
Hunc igitur terrorem animi tenebrasque necesse est
Non radii solis neque lucida tela diei
Discutiant, sed naturæ species ratioque.”
Lucretius, whose great poem is devoted to an exposition of the physical
side of Epicureanism, _i.e._ of the Atomic Philosophy of Democritus,[90]
is only on the same ground with Epicurus himself when he makes it clear,
not merely by the general complexion of his argument, but by a large
number of particular passages, and those, too, the most strikingly
beautiful in the poem, that the investigation of natural phenomena is to
serve only as a means of freeing the life of humanity from those cares
and vices which are hostile to its peace:—
“Denique avarities et honorum cæca cupido
Quæ miseros homines cogunt transcendere fines
Juris et interdum socios scelerum atque ministros
Noctes atque dies niti præstante labore
Ad summas emergere opes, hæc vulnera vitæ
Non minimam partem _mortis formidine_ aluntur.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account