The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
It is clear that the doctrine of the Osiris in its developed form is
inconsistent with the idea of the _ka_. But it is also clear that without
the idea of the _ka_ it would never have been formed. Both presuppose an
individuality separate from the person to which it belongs, and yet at the
same time material, an individuality which continues after death and
manifests itself under the same shape as that which characterised the
person in life. The popular conception of the ghost, which reproduces not
only the features but even the dress of the dead, is analogous.
Fundamentally the Osiris is a _ka_, but it is a _ka_ which represents not
only the outward shape, but the inner essence as well. The whole man is
there, spiritually, morally, intellectually, as well as corporeally. The
doctrine of the Osiris thus absorbs, as it were, the old idea of the _ka_,
and spiritualises it, at the same time confining it to the life after
death.
But if the conception of a double, unsubstantial and yet materialised,
underlay the belief in the Osiris, the practice of embalming was equally
responsible for it. The continued existence of the double was dependent on
the continued existence of the body, for the one presupposed the other,
and it was only the mummified body which could continue to exist. As long
as the double was believed to haunt the tomb, and there receive the food
and other offerings which were provided for it, the connection between it
and the mummy presented no difficulties. But when the Egyptian came to
look forward to the heaven of Osiris, first on this nether earth and then
in the skies, the case was wholly altered. The mummy lay in the tomb, the
immortal counterpart of the man himself was in another and a spiritual
world. The result was inevitable: the follower of Osiris soon assured
himself that one day the mummified body also would have life and action
again breathed into it and rejoin its Osiris in the fields of paradise.
Had not the god carried thither his divine body as well as its
counterpart? and what the god had done those who had become even as he was
could also do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account