The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Philosophy
The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Political science -- Early works to 1800; State, The -- Early works to 1800
XXX. * * * * * * Plato described a state more to be desired, than to be
hoped for upon the smallest scale. He did not constitute things as they
might exist, but in such a manner as the nature of civil affairs might
be considered. As to myself, if in any way I am able to accomplish it,
with the same principles which he had in view, I will look, not into the
picture and shadow of a state, but into a most powerful republic; that I
may appear to touch, as it were, the true cause of every public good and
evil. After these two hundred and forty years of regal government, and
indeed a little more, including the interregnums, Tarquin being
banished, the royal title was as odious to the Roman people, as it had
been regretted after the death, or rather the disappearance of Romulus,
and as much as they wanted a king then, in like manner, after the
expulsion of Tarquin, they could not endure the name of one.
XXXI. Under this feeling our ancestors then expelled Collatinus, who was
innocent, through apprehension of his family connexions, and the other
Tarquins from disgust at their names. From the same cause too P.
Valerius ordered the fasces to be lowered when he began to speak before
the people; and had his building materials taken to the foot of the
Velia, as soon as he perceived the suspicions of the people to be raised
on account of his having begun to build in a more conspicuous part of
the Velia, the very place where King Tullus had dwelt. He also, in the
which he greatly deserved the name of Publicola, had that law passed for
the people, which was first carried in the meetings of the centuries,
that no unfriendly magistrate should put to death, or flog any Roman
citizen for appealing. The pontifical books however declare appeals to
have existed under the kings; the augural records show it also. The
twelve tables too in many laws indicate that it was lawful to appeal
from every judgment and punishment. What is brought down to us by
tradition, of the Decemvirs who wrote the laws, being created without
any appeal, sufficiently shows that the other magistrates had not the
power of judging without appeal. The law, too, which for the sake of
concord passed in the consulate of Lucius Valerius Potitus, and M.
Horatius Barbatus, men very justly popular; sanctioned the principle,
that no magistrate should be created without appeal. Nor did the Portian
laws, which are three as you know of the three Portii, contain any thing
new except the confirmation of it. Publicola therefore, upon the law in
favour of appeal being published, immediately ordered the axes to be
taken from off the fasces, and the next day had Sp. Lucretius appointed
to him as his colleague: being his superior in age, he ordered his own
lictors to go to him; and first established the custom that lictors
should precede each of the consuls, alternate months, lest the ensigns
of command among a free people, should be as numerous as in a kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account