The Republic of the Future; or, Socialism a RealityDodd, Anna Bowman
Science
The Republic of the Future; or, Socialism a Reality
Dodd, Anna Bowman
Utopias
First, let us take the subject of work. As all work, men and women
alike, and as machinery has been brought here to a wonderful degree
of perfection, the actual labor necessary to maintain the people is,
of necessity, very light. At first, a hundred or so years ago, in the
early days of the community, the time of labor was fixed at five hours
per day. But every decade, with the growth of the population, the labor
hours have been diminishing. Recently a law has been put into effect,
forbidding any one’s working more than two hours a day. This latter law
has been found to be an actual necessity, from an economic point of
view, as a provision against surplus production. A man, therefore, has
the whole of the rest of his day on his hands, to spend as best he may.
The original hope and belief of the founders of Socialism was that if
the people could only be given sufficient leisure, the whole race would
be lifted to an extraordinary plane of perfection; that, were men given
time enough, each man and woman would devote himself and herself to the
development and improvement of his or her mental tastes and capacities.
At first, I believe, such was the case. For at least thirty years there
was an extraordinary zeal for learning and self-improvement. But in
time, a reaction came. The founders had forgotten to make allowances
for the mass of sluggards, idlers, and ne’er-do-wells who are always
the immovable block in the reformer’s path of progress. Two parties
were soon developed; the party of enlightenment and the conservative
party. Learning being the sole channel for the exercise of individual
capacity or individual ambition, the old baneful system of competition
soon developed itself. A superior class, a class composed of scholars,
students, artists and authors, arose, whose views and whose political
ideas threatened the very life and liberties of the community. The
aristocracy of intellect, it was found was as dangerous to the State
as an aristocracy founded on pride of descent or on the possession
of ancestral acres. It became necessary, therefore, to make a law
against learning and the sciences. All scholars, authors, artists and
scientists who were found on examination to be more gifted than the
average, were exiled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account