Cyrus, the Younger, approximately 423 B.C.-401 B.C.; Greece -- History -- Expedition of Cyrus, 401 B.C.; Iran -- History -- To 640
The power of the satraps was practically absolute, and a thoroughly
disloyal Satrap could even go so far as to seize some favourable
opportunity to detach his province from the empire and make himself
an independent sovereign. The King was, indeed, accustomed to make a
journey of inspection every year into one or other of his provinces,
but in each province such visits were of rare occurrence, and a Satrap
who wished to seek his own advantage, instead of studying the interests
of the King and of the empire, had every opportunity of doing so. ‘The
empire is large,’ he might well say to himself, ‘and the King is far
away.’
With a view to checking such tendencies on the part of the Satraps,
the Persian nobles were trained in habits of implicit obedience and
subjection to the sovereign, and were kept in constant fear of being
ruined by some report of treason or misgovernment on their part which
should reach the ears of the King. Upon the smallest suspicion, and
without any sort of trial, a man who was accused of plotting treason
against the King might be removed from his post, and either openly or
secretly put to death. A story is told of Darius I., who was one of
the best of the Great Kings, that once, when he was about to engage
in an expedition against the Scythians, a Persian noble prostrated
himself before him, and craved as a boon that of his three sons he
might be allowed to keep one at home with him. The King answered that
he should keep them all at home, and gave command to put them to death
immediately.
In a similar manner the people were crushed by severe and cruel laws,
just as wild animals are cowed by ill-treatment and want of food. As
conquered nations they were not expected to have any attachment to
the King, or any interest in the welfare of the empire, and although
now and again services rendered to the King would be rewarded by
overwhelming favours, yet the means chiefly relied upon for securing
good behaviour was the certainty that every offence would meet with
prompt and barbarous punishment. Not only criminals, but even persons
merely suspected of having committed crimes, were put to death in the
most horrible manner. Some were crushed between stones, others were
torn limb from limb, and others, again, suffered painful imprisonment
in troughs. For merely trifling offences they were cruelly mutilated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account