The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretation — John Shaqi
The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretationAmes, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Religion
The Revelation of St. John the Divine : $b An interpretation
Ames, A. H. (Alfred Henno)
Bible. Revelation -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The second prelude also has reference to the limitations within which
all revelation is confined. “There was given me a reed like unto a
rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God,
and the altar, and them that worship therein. But the court which is
without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto
the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and
two months.”
There are two elements in this which furnish guides to its
interpretation. One is the distinction so emphatically made between
the temple itself, which, as we know, was reserved exclusively for
Israelites, and the outer courts, which were given to the Gentiles.
The other is the use of the symbolical number forty-two.
Now is it not a reasonable thing that the apostle, when about to point
us to the law and the prophets as God’s two witnesses, shall put a
broad distinction between them and all mere human productions? The
temple itself is the field within which they fulfill their office, and
those only who speak from it are God’s accredited messengers. If the
Scriptures are the standard by which truth concerning the kingdom of
Christ is to be tested, if they have authority to bind the consciences
of men, there must be some criterion by which they shall be judged.
And this is the criterion――“Salvation is of the Jews.” God’s messengers
and witnesses sprang from them. And Paul confirms this declaration
when he says that the chief advantage which the Jews had was that
“unto them were committed the oracles of God.” The highest creations
of human genius fall short of the special inspiration which belonged to
the prophets and patriarchs and apostles of Israel. The outer courts,
indeed, were given to the Gentiles. Theirs was the world of art, of
science, of commerce, of literature, of politics, of earthly dominion;
but the temple and the altar belonged to the chosen race. Brilliant
stars brightened the darkness of the Gentile sky, but the sun of
spiritual truth shone only to the teachers whom God called out of
Israel; and Homer and Æschylus, and muse and sibyl, must “pale their
ineffectual fires” in the presence of his seers and anointed ones. And
this is confirmed by the use of the symbolical number forty-two. This
number, as we have seen in the Introduction, typifies a period which
has definite limits and fulfills a specific purpose. It may designate
Judaism proper or Gentilism proper. And the meaning here is that now,
and throughout this present cycle of time, the kingdom of God has been
taken from the Jew and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits
of the kingdom. Neither the temple, nor the altar, nor the inspired
Scriptures belong now exclusively to the Jew. The chosen race has
forfeited its prerogative of exclusiveness, and the foot of the Gentile
treads the inner as well as outer court. The Bible belongs to us as
well as to Israel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account